Snorkle Ban

Folks, I just got this in the Pinzgauer list. Watch out for your fording kits!!!

Dick

Willem-Jan Marker> > For all offroad friends, in particular Minnesotans, time for you to > stand up for your rights. > Speak up now, or be silent on this topic forever. > > And while it might seem to affect only Minnesota, please realize that > this could set a nasty precedent for other US-states. > > Complete background story, first posted 20 march 2004, been running > on several (Land Cruiser related) mailinglists since: > >
formatting link
> Below first the final plea, from Alex Woodmansee, the lady who has > spend tons of hours fighting this bill the polite way, to contact the > senator who created this lunacrous proposition: > (note that the last reactions from his office imply that the senator > has NO interest in changing the current wording at all (despite what > he told before, the bastard!), so the polite game has ended; not only > contact his office by all possible means, but Minnesotans should > their own Minnesota senator, to oppose this bill as strongly as > possible) > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > From: "woodmansee" > Subject: [DTLC] snorkel ban help > Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:19:12 -0600 > > all right, i am starting to get scared now, i am begging everyone, i > don't care where you are, to e-mail Senator Frederickson > > snipped-for-privacy@senate.mn > > or call and leave a voice mail (651) 296-8138 > > and ask that he do a line item delete on his snorkel ban language in > SF 2793 > > thanks > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Last & most important message, falsifying the idea that it would > affect only non-road-legal ATV's: > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > From: "woodmansee" > Subject: Re: (Fwd) Re: [80_usa] (Fwd) snorkel ban help / Minnesota > Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 11:47:32 -0600 > > okay, here's the whole deal > >
formatting link
> senate file 2793 chief author frederickson in subdivision 1 section c > reads > > "A person may not operate an off-highway vehicle off-road on public > land or public waters with an air intake pipe that is more than six > inches above the manufacturer's original air-intake pipe" > > in MN an off highway vehicle is defined as an ATV (all terrain > vehicle i.e. a three or four wheeler like a Honda Foreman, etc.), an > OHM (off-highway motorcycle), and an ORV (off-road vehicle) which is > what a land cruiser would fall under. > > now, the definition of an ORV is a vehicle licensed under MN statute > blah blah blah (which means a vehicle that is highway licensed) that > is then taken off road. so, if there were a toyota corolla that > wanted to go on a "trail" (NOT a forest road) in a state forest say > to go berry picking (yes, in MN this is a reality), that corolla then > becomes an ORV. > > highway licensed vehicles are NOT exempt from this snorkel ban. > > the proposed ban makes it illegal to operate an ATV, OHM, or ORV with > a snorkel while off road on state lands, not just state forests, but > any state lands. there are exemptions for those doing utility, > logging, or farm work and such. > > so, i can keep my snorkels on my trucks and be fine as long as i am > never off road on any state lands with them. otherwise, to be in > compliance while off road on state lands, i would have to remove my > safari snorkel from my truck. ya, right, like i can do that. > > my three diesel cruisers are daily drivers for me. i put snorkels on > for all the well known on road reasons. and keep in mind water and > wetland crossings are already illegal here! but my trucks are also > my trail rigs and do see trail time anywhere from 5% to 15% of the > time. this law would force me to forgo a furture or undo a current > modification that is really designed and used for on road purposes > only on trucks are on road the majority of the time. most of the > trucks in MN that have snorkels are also mostly road denizens (land > rovers). the only trucks that are truly off road only trailer queens > are some of the suzukis with the RPMs club. so this law is really the > biggest punishment to people who have highway licensed vehicles with > snorkels on them for the obvious smart on road reasons who wish to > take those particular trucks off road from time to time on MN state > lands. > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > And NO, this is NOT a late April Fool's joke. > > -- > Bye, > > Willem-Jan Markerink > > The desire to understand > is sometimes far less intelligent than > the inability to understand > > > [note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!] > > For searchable archives go to

formatting link
Additional, oldergraphics and texts are available at:
formatting link
. Tounsubscribe via email: From your email program, send a blank message to snipped-for-privacy@yahoogroups.com

Yahoo! Groups Links > > To visit your group on the web, go to: >
formatting link
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > snipped-for-privacy@yahoogroups.com > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: >
formatting link

===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=== To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to To reach a human, contact

Brian's Military Jeeps of WWII

formatting link
Squadron Patches of WWII

Reply to
Brian French
Loading thread data ...

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.