Maximum mileage a timing belt will last?

Whats the maximum mileage a genuine timing belt will last? Would any particular conditions affect how long it would last, or make no difference?

Reply to
Greg Davy
Loading thread data ...

Lot's of rapid acceleration & deceleration & running in a low gear as opposed to high speed cruising, running it where dirt can get in there & a misfire tends to be the harsh end of life. It's more dependent on vehicle design than anything else though, Pintos & 8V VW engines seem happy to do over 100000m, transit diesels & 20V VW engines seem to only just get past

36000
Reply to
Duncan Wood

How does that shorten timing belt life? The load on the belt is pretty constant in relation to engine revs.

Reply to
Grunff

My Nissan Bluebird did 90,000 on the first and 90,000 on the second both were still in good condition (recomm.is 60,000). I then bought a Bosch replacement instead of the after market type. The original power steering & alternator belts were changed at 180,000 stil in almost perfect condition! Quality plus good alignment and tension I guess. Older BMWs seem prone-a friends let go at 90,000 and wrecked the engine.

It's a similar situation to those rear chains on motorcyles-keeping an unsatisfactory technology for no good reason.

Reply to
David Wood

Then he only had himself to blame - IIRC no BMW ever reckoned on this sort of life.

Reply to
Dave Plowman

The message from Duncan Wood contains these words:

As far as I can tell, the belt on my diesel Maestro has been in there for 133000 miles.

Reply to
Guy King

The message from Dave Plowman contains these words:

For the belt...or the whole car!

Reply to
Guy King

Load is pretty constant yes, but the torque that the belt transmits is proportionally dependant on engine speed.- at idle the belt is under the greatest strain whereas at high speed the power is still the same but torque demand alot lower.

Tim..

Reply to
Tim..

What? and you're happy to leave it there?

Rob Graham

Reply to
Rob Graham

Why is that? Once the camshaft is turning, whenever you're opening a valve, there's another one closing, which evens out the torque required. No?

Reply to
Grunff

My brother is determined to run my old 520 up to 1/4 million miles. But he changes the cambelt regularly. ;-)

Of course, BMW learnt the error of their ways and dispensed with rubber bands some 10 years ago.

Reply to
Dave Plowman

The message from "Rob Graham" contains these words:

Yup. The car cost £300, is probably worth £30 and I CBA to change it 'cos I'll be changing cars in a few months anyway.

Reply to
Guy King

The message from Dave Plowman contains these words:

Yup. It's unlikely I'll bother to MOT it again...if all goes according to plan it'll be painlessly destroyed by then...possibly by cambelt failure.

Reply to
Guy King

In message , Dave Plowman writes

I had one in my Montego and I found a tear in the belt. Although it transpired that it had been there for over 1000 miles, the 1.5 mile drive to the Rover dealer was nerve racking.

The dealer reported that the cambelt had previously been removed and witness marks indicated that the belt had been pried off with a screwdriver. I had owned the car from new and it had been serviced exclusively by an authorised Rover dealer in Germany so there was no doubt who had done it.

The UK dealer submitted its report to Rover UK who paid for the replacement in full.

Reply to
Paul Giverin

Some of the newer stuff has replacement intervals of over 80000 or 5 years, I think I saw one on Autodata that was 100000, the 5 year rule applies to all timing belts as this is the maximum life span of rubber.

Reply to
Fred

That must be why all rubber fuel/brake/clutch/coolant hoses need replacing every five years.

Reply to
Grunff

The message from "Mark" contains these words:

They're like fleas on a junkyard dog.

Reply to
Guy King

Theirs a Marine version of this engine, so the engine alone if running would be worth something to the Hello Sailor brigade.

Reply to
Mark

Dave Baker had a very good section in his website about the loading of cams actually being lower at mid-engine speed, rather than at low speed.

formatting link
Paragraph 7.

If this holds true for the amount of power/whatever the belt has to transmit, then the relationship between engine speed and belt "force" is a strange one.

I have to say I've learned more about engines reading Dave's site than any book. It's concentrated information!

Pete.

Reply to
Pete Smith

Chains are superior for reasons of efficiency of power transmission and manufacture. A belt would have to be prohibitively wide, to cope with the power-output of modern motorcycles. A belt-drive must be perfectly aligned too, or the teeth on the belt will be shredded, as I believe sometimes happens on the one current belt-drive motorcycle that I am aware of.

Reply to
Steve

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.