OT: We need alternative energy...but Not In My Backyard!

Here we go again: Round 2

ROWE ? Unlike the nuclear reactor that stopped operating here in 1992, after generating electricity for more than 30 years, and unlike even the hydroelectric generators along the Deerfield River, turbines spinning in the wind might be a downright friendly way to make power ?and maybe even an attractive alternative to fossil-fuel power plants.

But don?t tell that to David Roberson or other members of the National Wind Watch, a 1½-year-old organization based in Rowe that tries to counteract what its members call the ?feel-good? image of wind energy.

Roberson, who?s vice president of the nonprofit group that tries to dispel wind power?s positive spin and help local opponents of wind projects everywhere, points to the chickens, goats, geese and other farm animals behind his house, and to the dozen years he and his wife spent living off the power grid in Hawley before moving here, as demonstrating his concern about the environment.

?I?ve always been interested in sustainability and always considered myself an ecological person,? said Roberson, eager to show he?s no mere NIMBY. He?d even contemplated building a wind turbine for his house before moving here eight years ago. But since the house was already hooked up to utility lines, he abandoned those plans and eventually began thinking of wind generation as an expensive, impractical proposition ?just to make a statement.?

_________________________________________

formatting link

Another example of the county I live in. After years and years and years of hearing the Eco-Freaks crying about how generating electricty is wrecking the ecology, a group comes in and wants to erext a wind farm in Heath. Nope...no good. Now, they are looking at Rowe, a town of maybe

3,000 people and PLENTY of wind available...Nope.

"Not just another NIMBY", huh?

Wanna bet?

Nation Wind Watch, just another group opposed to anything...just like SprawlBusters...Google it...

Reply to
Hachiroku
Loading thread data ...

Found a post I made here in December. He's not a NIMBY...

He's a COVE:

Yeah, that sums this area up in a *nut*shell... :)

Reply to
Hachiroku

Actually thousands of birds are killed by energy wind farms. They must be carefully placed as to no upset migratory patterns. Either that or someone needs to come up with a means to keep the birds clear of the spinning turbine blades.

Reply to
Art

It is called a double barrel shotgun....

Reply to
Scott in Florida

Wind generation is a boondoggle. I don't see where it will even cause a small dent in total energy independence. We need more nukes on line and quit fooling around with this silly stuff. It's just another government tax deduction for some.

Reply to
dbu,

That number (thousands) is accurate. Actually 6400 outside California, so perhaps "tens of thousands" would be accurate.

formatting link
However to put this in perspective, 130 to 174 million bird deaths a year occur due to power transmission lines, and 60 and 80 million birds annually are due to collisions with motor vehicles.

So next time somebody advocates against windpower for this reason, ask them if they want to eliminate AC power and motor vehicles as well.

Reply to
Bill Tuthill

Yeah, that's what they say.

But there was a Government funded study I saw in the same paper 6 months ago that says birds aren't quite that dumb...

Reply to
Hachiroku

"A 1986 study found that 69 million birds flew though the San Gorgonio Pass during the Spring and Fall migrations. During both migrating seasons, only 38 dead birds were found during that typical year, representing only 0.00006% of the migrating population. "

Seems fairly acceptable to me. I've killed more birds driving...

I think that's the plan.

Reply to
Hachiroku

I'm in favor of alternative energy, incl. wind farms. However, I also believe all aspects of their impact should be taken into account & engineered & placed in the least disruptive ways possible.

AFAIK, only one; it was a hawk, on the NYS Thruway many years ago. I saw him (her?) up in a tree on the roadside, but for some reason instead of staying up there, down s/he flew, diagonally towards me. Hit the car's antenna & when I looked in the rearview mirror, s/he was landing on the road behind me. :-(

Cathy

Reply to
Cathy F.

I hate it when hawks or any other wildlife get hit by cars. The hawk was only focused on prey, it never saw your car.

Reply to
dbu.,

Agreed.

Reply to
sharx35

Sometimes there is NOTHING one can do to avoid such tragedies e.g. deer sometimes run right into the SIDES of vehicles.

Reply to
sharx35

Um...what have you done with Sharx...?!

Reply to
Hachiroku

Except one I nailed was trying to get AWAY from a hawk!

Reply to
Hachiroku

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.