Re: Suburban question

>> '84-'86 were carbureted and had the better early version of the 4spd >> auto. '88-'91 were TBI which got a little better MPG. All were solid >> axle/leaf spring front suspension. With front bench and 3rd row seat they >> would haul 9 in relative comfort. with front buckets, 8. In either form, >> there was a good bit of room behind the 3rd row seat. If you plan to do >> any med or better towing go for the 3/4T which would hurt MPG a bit. For >> light-med towing and/or a driver the 1/2T would do fine. For some reason >> the stronger 12bolt rear was dropped for the >> barely-enough-for-a-passenger-car 10bolt. I have 12bolts swapped into my >> '85 and '88 Suburbans and plan to put HD 3/4T axles into my '88. I'm sure >> there are a few 305 powered Suburbans, but I would NEVER want a 305 in >> anything. I had one and was disgusted with it. Little power and poor >> economy even in a Blazer which is over 1500lbs lighter than a Suburban. A >> 350 is the minimum to run. > > > The suburban was only offered in the 350, 454 and 6.2 diesel (in the 70's it > was offered with a 400). If I were you get a 90 or a 91 they are old enough > to find for a good price, new enough to find parts and new enough that you > can ask for help when a problem pops up. Just be sure to get the barn doors > (no tailgate) because the rear floor cross member rusts out and the tailgate > will not open (or close) after a while. Also look at the rear wheel wells > they rust open and the owners just ignore them. The front wheel wells also > rust out but only cost $37 to get new wells so they are not a concern. I > looked at a 90 with a 454 for $3k and the rear wells had holes large enough > to put your fist through...was a shame the rest of the truck was spotless. > Therefore, pre-91 700R4 trans, post-91 4L60E for half ton and 4L80E for the > 3/4 ton, the engine are the same. Pre-91 mechanical speedo, post 91 > electronic... Try to find something with no more then 100k if it is your > primary vehicle or travel truck, try to find something less then 150k if you > are just driving the kids to practice or you to work. If the wife is > driving it then get a suburban less then a few years old (the first time it > breaks down you will never hear the end of it). We have a 96 at school that > is basically the same drive train as the 91 but a newer body style so that > would be a better choice if you don't want a truck to play with...and you > probably can pick up a 96-97 for less then 10k. My 91 gets about 13-14 mpg > the 96 at school gets 15-16 so anything with a throttle body and the old > style rotating distributor should be able to be repaired at home with a > little talent. I would not bother with anything less then the 90's because > there just is going to be too much rust. However, I bet you could go into > the late 90's and still meet you criteria. I would also try to stay with a > 3/4ton truck. They were a little more heavy duty and (environmentalists > stop reading here) are allowed a little more leeway with the emissions. > > > > You could also pick up a late 90's with a 6.5 diesel but they are a premium > so if you find one grab it! They are easy to work on, will run for ever and > get good gas mileage. > > > good luck, > mark > >

Thank you and the other posters for a nice introduction to Suburbans. After reading and trying to digest all this I looked around, ebay was one source, and now I am intrigued with the Diesel version Mark mentioned.

Most of what came up was the 80s though. I guess they have a mechanical FI so they should get better mileage (one seller claimed 20mpg) and one might still find an older one (to keep the price low).

I'll be looking for a while, that¹s for sure.

Uwe

Reply to
Jaggy Taggy
Loading thread data ...

Well, I am still looking for my older Diesel Suburban, but maybe someone can shed some light into the various models, Scottsdale?, Cheyenne?? Are there more?? Very confusing

Uwe

Reply to
Jaggy Taggy

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.