1. Home
  2. Classic Cars - UK
  3. Re: Would you rent a tent from this man?

Re: Would you rent a tent from this man?

IIRC says they look after a 14 year old. Given that he's mixed up > with social workers

Perhaps that's where you went wrong, stwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanlie!! If only you were able to communicate reasonably with the authorities, you may have been able to see your daughter more often. BTW, why, given the little time you are allowed to see her, do you need to be supervised? Maybe Andrew, or is it Mike this week, could have one of his friends dig out some paperwork on you. It'll save you telling us a pack of lies!!

> Was he using a forged address :) > > Yes. Didn't you realise? He was using the email addy of > snipped-for-privacy@meat.com when he posted as P&S (and bear in mind he > considers himself a 'webmaster') but the domain 'meat.com' belongs > to a company in the USA, (a place he says he hates, but I bet he's > never been - see his posts in the soc.culture.iraq NG) based in a > place called Pella, in Iowa.
formatting link
> > Now given that I had cocked up by contravening the AUP of the Berlin > news server by using the domain name of 'dick.com' which was seized > on by Pork's alter ego of Stan Snot and who had my account dropped,

I told you that you would feel better once you admitted to it, didn't I? And all those denials.................

I thought what was sauce for the goose should also be sauce for the > gander. After all, if his alter ego could drop me in it for my > innocent eror, it seemed poetic justice to return the compliment.

So, did you get him thrown of f the Berlin server, like wot I did to you? :-0

So I thought I really should inform the people at meat.com of his > unauthorised use of their domain name (this is a 'webmaster', > remember?) and although he denies it (what's new?), I reckon he was > bollocked by them. If you recall, he suddenly changed his name to > Lamb Chop and started using a hotmail addy, all aboutn that time.

Could have been worse, I suppose!! He could have been chucked off, like you. Perhaps he hadn't posted personal details of other posters, like wot you did. It would seem unfair for you to get banned, just for using a forged email address.

>>> Yes, I think we are getting to see the fuller picture of sausage >>>> the "made up a fake name" poster :) he really does seem to get >>>> misxed up, one minute it his parents who are the landlords and the >>>> next he says "if justice is so inequitable that it allows someone >>>> to deliberately and blatantly state that she has no intentions of >>>> ever paying any rent and leave me no recourse but to attempt an >>>> extremely costly and lengthy eviction proces (during which of >>>> course she stays and still dont pay rent) then I'll do the exact >>>> same thing again and simply give away my assets." > > Isn't that interesting? On the one hand he says that about himself, > and on the other hand he untruthfully accuses ME of being unemployed > and hiding behind the shield of legal aid with no assets so as to > avoid the consequences of losing any legal action I may choose to > initiate.

What!! You're unemployed? Damn cheek!! We all know you're working, stwaaaaaaaaaaanlie, you told us!! But I can understand the confusion, because you claim state benefits at the same time, like wot you told us!!

But that's the problem when his alter ego Snot > obsessively trawls back years to try to find whatever he can about > me, wrongly extrapolates what he reads due to his desire to find > something, anything, dterimental about me, and then makes a tit of > himself.

Well, lets extrapolate a bit more.............. don't be afraid to interrupt me if I go wrong......(I've included your bit about the judge, mainly because you've just lied about it ....again)

2/8/2000 stwaaanlie admitted: "Out of interest, what would I have to pay for advice and assistance (the old form 10, I think it was) with an income of just under £170 per month from a private pension and JSA of £5.61 a week (about £24 a month)?" 5/8/2000 stwaaaaaaaaaaanlie started on his path to benefit fraud: "Last weekend, went to local retail park which contains a Homebase + electrical and furniture stores. I wanted to see if I could put some flyers on windscreen to advertise a small business (small building jobs) I was thinking of setting up." 13/8/2000 stwaaaaaaaaaaaaanlie passes round his begging bowl: "Trouble is, when you are an a meagre pension of £165 per month and £9.22 per fortnight dole money, as I am, then 'ten poxy quid', no doubt plus p&p,can take quite a long time to scrape together. Especially when you've also got large debts from fighting for 5 years in a legal battle over your 5 year old daughter which started when she was just 9 weeks old." 1/9/2000 stwaaaaaaaaanlie lied??: "Couldn't agree more. I do some building work and so on to earn a crust." 29/5/2001stwaaaaaaaaaanlie looks for sympathy: "I see children (mine and others) as even more important. And 50 quid is a weeks income for me on my tiny pension and 14 quid of dole money." 14/8/2002 stwaaaaaaaanlie bragged (or was it lied?): "Me, I'm now semi-retired and my pension and earnings make me OK, ta. Why should I worry? I don't need to work again because I looked after myself and my other family in the past." 3/7/2002 stwaaaaaaaanlie plans his revenge on a judge: "Well, they'll have to be able to get blood from a stone then. As is well known, there are only two classes of people who can afford to litigate - the very rich and the very poor. I'm in the latter category. I am on JSA, have no assets to speak of, and those I do I shall sell to my children on condition that they allow me to use them for my lifetime. As to my house, well there is very little equity in it, I am in (slight) arrears with my mortgage and even if they put a charge on the house to recover costs, there's bugger all for them to have. Indeed, I suspect the old bugger I want to sue would be dead before the house was sold. I am told I should put it in trust for my kids before any proceedings start. Any advice on how to do this?"

-- .....Anyone fancy a peanut?.....

Reply to
Purrrrrrrfect Stan
Loading thread data ...

Well? Are you going to tell us what it is? It's not often we hear that remark from you!!

I mean, more often than you see your own arse!!

So sue me!!

Where, where!!

No!! I'm going to tell them I am stwaaaaaaaaaanlie mould and have myself sectioned!!

I told you before, stwaaaaaaaaaaanlie, he pissed himself when he found out you got binned!! How many more times?

Of course. So no hard feelings then? Still, a pity you got binned and Andrew or Mike didn't though!! Never mind...no hard feelings!!

Who knows, stwaaaaaaaaanlie, and it won't bother me one bit. I have plenty more, as you know.

Yeah, but you failed to get him binned, like wot I did to you!! So you're a failure really.

Now you just said I was dead right to pick it up. So it was hardly harassment to report you for a breach of the rules, was it? Do make your mind up stwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanlie!! Duh!!

Admission of harassment then? Or just childish tit for tat? Bwahahahahahahaah!!

Did I mention BY? No, you were chucked off the Berlin server. Pay attention!!

But it is a breach of Berlins AUP, as you quite rightly found out.

I thought it was snipped-for-privacy@dick.com... mmmmm, my mistake, carry on...

Well, you should have been aware of the consequences of using false addresses when you illegally used mine, but you did stop using it as soon as you received your bollocking, so I forgive you!

Who? Andrew?

Well, perhaps it's time to apologise to Mr John and his wife, oh, and Mr Morphet and his wife, for the damage and anxiety you have placed on them. It can only assist your case, when they come looking for you!!

Of course!! But it won't help you, stwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanlie, cos I'm not Mr John or Mr Morphet, either!!

Oh, so you lied when you wrote the following posts you so readily snipped?

Blimey, how time flies, I thought sure I quoted your posts from 2000 at the earliest!! And a few from last year!! You shoul read before you snip, never mind how hurtful your own words are!! BTW, just for you, I've included a more recent quote from you (23/5/2003) to show your deceit is still current.

No, they read YOUR words, stwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanlie, and then make up their own minds.

2/8/2000 stwaaanlie admitted: "Out of interest, what would I have to pay for advice and assistance (the old form 10, I think it was) with an income of just under £170 per month from a private pension and JSA of £5.61 a week (about £24 a month)?" 5/8/2000 stwaaaaaaaaaaanlie started on his path to benefit fraud: "Last weekend, went to local retail park which contains a Homebase + electrical and furniture stores. I wanted to see if I could put some flyers on windscreen to advertise a small business (small building jobs) I was thinking of setting up." 13/8/2000 stwaaaaaaaaaaaaanlie passes round his begging bowl: "Trouble is, when you are an a meagre pension of £165 per month and £9.22 per fortnight dole money, as I am, then 'ten poxy quid', no doubt plus p&p,can take quite a long time to scrape together. Especially when you've also got large debts from fighting for 5 years in a legal battle over your 5 year old daughter which started when she was just 9 weeks old." 1/9/2000 stwaaaaaaaaanlie lied??: "Couldn't agree more. I do some building work and so on to earn a crust." 29/5/2001stwaaaaaaaaaanlie looks for sympathy: "I see children (mine and others) as even more important. And 50 quid is a weeks income for me on my tiny pension and 14 quid of dole money." 14/8/2002 stwaaaaaaaanlie bragged (or was it lied?): "Me, I'm now semi-retired and my pension and earnings make me OK, ta. Why should I worry? I don't need to work again because I looked after myself and my other family in the past." 3/7/2002 stwaaaaaaaanlie plans his revenge on a judge: "Well, they'll have to be able to get blood from a stone then. As is well known, there are only two classes of people who can afford to litigate - the very rich and the very poor. I'm in the latter category. I am on JSA, have no assets to speak of, and those I do I shall sell to my children on condition that they allow me to use them for my lifetime. As to my house, well there is very little equity in it, I am in (slight) arrears with my mortgage and even if they put a charge on the house to recover costs, there's bugger all for them to have. Indeed, I suspect the old bugger I want to sue would be dead before the house was sold. I am told I should put it in trust for my kids before any proceedings start. Any advice on how to do this?" 23/5/2003 stwaaaaaaaaaaanlie confirms he still has customers (god knows how!) "I have said (nicely) to customers once or twice that if I have to do their running around they will have to pay and I should have done on this ocassion but I forgot."

Well, if they are, then your posts will be also. Can only be a good thing, stwaaaaaaaaaaanlie!!

Not until you told us, stwaaaaaaaaaaaaanlie. But you're so obsessed with Andrew or Mike at the moment, I suppose he will be Scorer or David next week!!

Well, if you ever find out what I've walked into, please tell us.

Well, I'm glad I'm not a peanut!! Just my like to get eaten by you, and suffer a stanaphylactic shock!!

-- .....Anyone fancy a peanut?.....

Reply to
Purrrrrrrrrrrrrfect Stan

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.