error code for 97 ram

Why would I want that. I have no reason not to believe you.

Perhaps because some people in here have a bit of an attitude problem that even exceeds mine at my worst.

LOL, gee, like I expected anything different form you.

You were wrong. Why? because you decided that there was no other way it could be, as evidenced by your name calling and insistance:

If you had been a reasonable person, and said that the info you had differed from someone else's, you'd have had a shot a being right. But you didn't . You immediately noted that the oher person couldn't possible know enough ( e.g. "dumbfuck") and noted what you felt was correct, and distinctly used a negative (e.g. "not") to describe the scenario you felt was incorrect.

I told you that you did not have a command of the language, and you've proven it again.

Have a nice day.

You dispute everything else, now you have no reason not to believe him? Holy crap, where are the demands for proof otherwise you are "right, again"?

Hell, stop spouting off like its a crime to own a fleet of vehicles.

Thats funny, really......

Actually, no I wasn't. The OP, while not naming the truck series, did say that he believed it had two sensors located on eater side of the converter and asked which one the error code was referring to. As for the name calling, that was once again and as usual, started by Gary. I did not "decide" it was the only way it could be done, I went by the OP's claims.

Funny how you cut out the line that this was in response two where he said started by calling me this first and then said explicitly that the truck had two sensors, one on each side. Why is it that Gary can make these statements and even make them first and when I respond in kind, it is me that has the problem. Sorry Max, but as usual, you arguments are just spin and have no merit.

Which is exactly what your little buddy did first, imagine that. The difference is that the OP specifically mentioned that he believed that his truck had a pre and post sensor, not one on each side and in a pre / post setup, a failure of the pre sensor will put the computer into open loop mode.

Is this more of your senseless ramblings in some lame attempt to make me dance. Sorry Max, all you are really doing is getting your strings tangled, puppet boy.

Lookit that, THREE more times where you justify being an ass by pointing at someone else and saying, "but he did it tooo!!"

You've now proven my assertion that you never take personal responsibility for what you do.

Actually, I flat out asked you why it was ok for him to do it but not me and as usual, you were unable to answer even simple question and instead, tried to spin it into something else. Talk about predictable.

LOL, only in Maxworld.

Why would I address Gary's actions with you? Predictable has nothing to do with it, placing responsibility with the person who IS responsible has everything to do with it.

Yeah, sorta like "only in Tbone world" where you don't have time to leap on my (hell, ANYONE'S) word in an effort to prove yourself superior. You got right on this one. So....

Have at it, I have a meeting tonight. I expect an answer in no more than 10 minutes, and please, make it as egotistical as possible while blaming everyone but yourself for your behavior. If I come back and you haven't jumped all over it, we'll know the reverse psychology is working. If you have jumped all over it, we'll know your in it just for the bullshit, like we said you were. Thanks for walking right into a catch-22, and have a nice night.

Max

Give a man a match, and he is warm for a short while. Light him on fire, and he is warm for the rest of his life.

Well, since he started it, that would make him responsible so I'll ask again, why is it ok for him and not me? Are you going to answer it this time or am I going to get more of this expected spin. Then again, there is always your deletion method.

LOL, think what you want, it really doesn't matter.

There is nothing to jump on. I blame no one for my behavior but do question why mine is the only one being questioned. Actually, we both know the answer to that one which does little for you credibility. This has probably taken less than 10 minutes because I am currently on my computer and just answered one of your lame posts a few minutes ago so it really wouldn't take much of a prediction to figure the timing out. As far as reverse psychology, in order for that to work, I would have to be concerned about what you think of me and I really don't so of course I'm in this thread now for the BS, just like you.

LOL, you thing a lot of yourself but I guess that is the only way for that to happen. Tell all of your buddies at AA that I said hi.

I don't have any control over the speed the news servers post at