guns on campus

"azwiley1" wrote

I made a statement about .357, I

Never assume. Damn, that's scary. You claim to own a handgun, yet don't know or can't state its exact caliber.

You though,

Is English your second language? It must be difficult for you, not being able to write sentences, spell correctly and to communicate clearly. Are you sure you went through the proper channels to buy and register your firearms?

Hell, I went so far as

And STILL failed to describe the shell correctly. Did the big words confuse you? How in the world did you get it right on the paperwork? You DID do paperwork on it, didn't you? Didn't you?

Sorry, I'm not gay.

Steve

PS: Who's Beryl?

Really, just joshin me? You called me and I quote "clueless short dicked egghead" because you made a errant assumption about something. You read something that was not there to read, and in turn started with the personal attacks and insults. It really would have been difficult for you to either, ask if I was refering to a Magnum, to have eduacted your self on the fact that there are other .357 calibers out there, or to have kept your mouth shut. I guess it would have, as you ASSUMED I was refering to a revolver and to a .357 Magnum.

Sorry, smiley face or other wise, why should I have thought or cared that you were "just Joshin the poster"?

Who cares honestly. Explain to me Mr. I'm just Joshin the Poster, why you ASSUMED that I was refering to a revolver and .357 Magmun. Appearantly you don't know very much about fire arms if you honestly thought that was the only combination for that type of round.

You got it right, YOU DON"T HAVE A CLUE.

I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. If by "very far of plumb," you mean the maniac who shot 32 innocent victims, 2 years prior to this slaughter was found to be mentally ill and a potential danger to himself, yet nobody did anything about it, and those who were in close contact stopped going to the same classes he was in because they were afraid of him, then I agree with you. However, there were 32 innocent victims of this "very for off plumb" person who had no means to protect themselves and payed the ultimate fate and probably didn't know he was "very far off plumb."

There have been several cases in which the courts have found that the police are not required to protect any individual, rather they are responsible for the protection of "society at large." You may reject any statistics you want, but I notice you fail to post anything in support of your argument except silly, baseless rhetoric.

One must use logic to reach policy decisions. Anecdotes do not scale beyond the indivual story. I fear the criminal in possesion of a gun. I don't fear the law abiding gun owner, why do you?

We have no evidence that the Pakistan Gov. is harboring and aiding Bin Ladin. Nice try with typical leftist hatred that does nothing towards presenting a solution. Do the Democrats have any plan for anything at all or is it all about what they don't like?

Do a search in Google Steve, Roy, the_guy, Tbone, miles and I have had numerous conversations about hang guns, where I stated numerous times, what I own. Sorry you are too stupid to understand that the regulars in here knew what I was refering too and that you needed very specific crayon drawn details. I know exactly what I own, I even posted you a link for it. Read it yet? Doubtful.

Are you sure you are done sucking Beryls dick?

Really, care to point out how and where I described it incorrectly?

You're not much a commedian, son. You need to work more on your jokes and less on your insults if you want to be funny, son.

Steve, you are truly the horses ass and an idiot (I've know one or the other before, but never both).

We have crossed wires somewhere. We agree.

My statements about statistics and conclusions were meant to say that some people just have their minds made up in a very biased skewed way, then go about finding statistics that support that invalid position. They're mind is made up, don't confuse them with facts. It's done in government and politics all the time. "Normal" people examine the facts and statistics, then reach a conclusion by the weight and content of the statistics and evidence they observe.

I wanted to point out that there are some people here who do just that. They have a thoroughly cemented preconceived position, and can and do find information to support themselves rather than hearing anything new.

I have been a victim, and had a family member who was a victim of people who were "a little off plumb." The police were contacted, and the best we could get out of them was "if they do kill someone, they will be in a lot of trouble." The two parties were killed about a month later during a home invasion. They broke into a man's house. The man intercepted the intruders, and the daughter ran into a closet. The two intruders beat the man, then threw him in the closet, not knowing the daughter was in there. She untied him. He then killed both of them with a handgun.

I have no fear of armed citizens, and wish the whole US was as lenient as Vermont, where any citizen can carry as long as they do so with no criminal intent. By reciprocity, at last tally, I am licensed to carry a concealed firearm in 39 states, being mainly licensed in Nevada, Utah, and Florida.

I firmly believe in the idea of "More Guns, Less Crime" authored by John Lott. There have been MANY (caps intentional) situations in my city of 1.5 million where innocent lives could have been saved by citizens carrying guns.

I do not know if it would have made a difference in this last situation, but I do have to believe that any resistance would have been better than what happened there.

And all the water, tears, and debate in the world will not wash away the blood of these victims from the liberal anti-gunners who think all we need to do to solve these situations are to ban guns and love people more. Or throw more tax dollars at the whole mess.

Why do people do these things? Because they know they will meet with no resistance because liberalism has neutered the American public.

Steve

"azwiley1" wrote

HANG GUN? What's a hang gun? I understand crayon, but don't understand that term. How are those English classes coming? Do you now see how utterly foolish you can be by trying to converse and not being able to spell and use proper grammar? And you say I'm too stupid. That's rich.

And I WAS impressed. Ooooooooo. Such a gun! Too bad you sent a picture of a gun instead of answering the topic of conversation.

Good God, You ARE as dumb as you project. There is no .357 round. There's a .357 SIG, a .357 Magnum. Go into a gun store and ask for a box of .357's. After they stop laughing, have THEM explain the difference to you.

When you buy ammo for your SIG (remember the SIG you claim to own - the one in the pretty picture?), how do you specifically ask for those rounds? Do you say, "I want a box of .357 SIG", or "I want a box of .357's"? In case you haven't noticed, or don't really own a SIG, there is a difference in the two rounds.

Now, get back on those English books. You either need to study more so you'll graduate with your class, or go back to school so you can spell correctly and learn the difference between too, to, and two. (as in "refering too") And "refering" is misspelled, too.

Sheesh. Compound stupid. You're stupid and you don't know you're stupid.

Steve

Why, thank you, Ed. I believe that's one of the nicest things anyone has ever said about me.

Steve

"azwiley1" wrote

Maybe. But I DO know the difference between a hand gun and a hang gun.

Steve

Sorry to hear about your humor impairedness, and do hope it improves.

Steve

OOOooooooo, so I miss type one letter. You obviously knew EXACTLY what I was talking about.

I did answer the topic of conversation, ironically enough, you never asked a question. So, please explain to me what it is that I failed to answer? I did not just send you a "pretty picture" I don't have any of your wife having sex with some one else. :) I sent you a link that was to Sig Arms website, that not only contained a photo of my fire arm but also contained the tech data you are ignorant too.

I'm sorry, but once again, those that know me and who I have been conversing with for many years knew exactly what I was refering too. I did not know that I was required to spell out in the smallest of detail everything I post for the assclowns who come in to just stir shit. I do go into the local gun stores and ask for a "box of .357" Why, because they know me and they know what I want, because they are the ones that sold me the fire arm.

I know there is a HUGE difference betweeen the two assclown. I never, ever said otherwise, hell I have made that very statement in just about every reply I have made to you. Whatever, you know it all, just like Sno* and are just plain stupid about somethings and will NEVER admit to being wrong when you are.

Since you seem to believe you know more about what I own then I do, be man enough to post a real email or reply to me directly and I will be happy to send you a picture of what you are ignorant to, as it sit right here on my desk. If not, STFU and crawl back under your rock.

"azwiley1" wrote

Just keep up with those English classes, and concentrate on the spelling part.

I hear the new "Hooked On Phonics" are better than the old course, too.

Keep at it. You have nowhere to go but up. I mean, it's not like you could do any worse than you are doing right now, is it?

Steve

In light of this post I appoligize for everything I said earlier in this thread, with the exception of anything that followed "Clueless short dicked eggheads." I still think you're a horse's ass, but I no longer think you are an idiot.

Let me understand this. You jumped into a conversation out of the blue, with personal attacks and insults, to some one you have never conversed with. You made brash assumptions about a subject to which you were not educated on and little knowledge about. You had no knowledge of the poster you attacked for no foreseen reason. You were responded to in the same manner as which you initiated things. You were provided information to disprove your assumptions that you did not read and now The absolute best you can do is come after some ones spelling and or language? Damn Beryl, you didn't need to change your screen name to prove you are a horses ass, we all knew that already. Bye Bye Troll

keep your day job steve, you'll never make it as a comedian dad.

no, i actually think it indicates that you spend way too much time on your computer. again, dad, just saying.

not sure about your knowledge of ballistics. the 357 mag and the 357 sig are not bad rounds ballistically. now, they are not so hot when you compare other options that are cheaper to buy, easier to control and have a little better ballisitics. but any firearms person would know that both rounds are capable of doing the job. your rant about how many walls the round will go through and how far it will go is unfounded as far as ballisitics go. it isn't the gun, it is the round and you can get a round to match just about any need. there are alot of self defense guns that have greater penetration than either 357 round that you talk about. so, you really just wanted to go after larry because he pissed you off, but what you wrote was as full of bull shit as you are.

seeing how you conduct yourself steve, i am not surprised that is one of the nicest things that anyone has ever said about you.