But what I said was: Ford still offers a light duty truck, the Sportrack, and it is a more capable truck than the Ranger
Bye bye US ranger..
Sep 22, 2010
26 Replies
formatting link
>>
formatting link
>>
Please not the facts: 1) It is named Sport Trac, not Sportrack. 2) Ford is dicontinuing the Sport Trac BEFORE they are dicontinuing the Ranger. 3) The Sport Trac is not significantly more cabale than a Ranger (it can tow more when properly equipped, but has a lower cargo capacity, assuming both are configured for the max). While the capabilities are similar, the Sport Trac is MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE. Anyone needing a truck is not likely to see the Sport Trac as a replacment for the Ranger. 4) Ford considers the Sport Trac and SUV, not a truck.
Your batting average is till hovering around .000 (as is normal).
Ed
formatting link
>>>
formatting link
>>>
Perhaps but it will carry light cargo and more passengers than a Ranger. ;)
formatting link
>>>>
formatting link
>>>>
But it will still go out of production ayear before a Ranger. So when the Ranger goes out production NEXT YEAR, you cannot claim that the Sport Trac is a potential alternative (your original erroneous claim). So, you have almost, but not quite been completely wrong - again. At laast once could you check your facts instead of just making stuff up on the fly?
formatting link
>>>>>
formatting link
>>>>>
Actually, the Sport Trac and the Ranger can both carry five passengers.
Get a clue.
Jeff
formatting link
>>>>>
formatting link
>>>>>
What's your point? What I SAID was: "Ford still offers a light duty truck, the Sport Track, and it is a more capable truck than the Ranger," what make you believe that not factual? ;)
formatting link
>>>>>>
formatting link
>>>>>>
Perhaps but not ALL Rangers ;)
formatting link
>>>>>>
formatting link
>>>>>>
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required