It probably will. If you consider the Camry and the Fusion as comparable,
the Fusion offers a price advantage and if the reliability is there, people
will carefully consider the Fusion.
However, it won't happen overnight. I was impressed enough with the ratings
of Ford on some things to consider one this summer. My wife, however,
remembers very well how Ford treated us before and said, "NO!"
The reason that GM and Ford still sell any cars at all is because it take
time to lose market share. The flip side is that it also takes time to gain
it. They're also lucky that 40% of US auto buyers will absolutely not
consider an Asian car, no matter what. And their market share is getting
down towards this hard core.
I don't have the figures in front of me but let's say, for the sake of
argument, that CR says Ford is 20% more reliable than a Camry. Personal
Ford history and spousal input aside, what do I do next year if I want a
sedan? There's a good chance I'd buy a Camry. Why? Because my current
Toyotas have given satisfaction and, on a personal basis, the Ford is
unkown. I can lean towards it over other makes but if I'm happy with what I
have, why switch? If a Camry is significantly more expensive, I might
reconsider. If the Fusion has features I really like, I'll consider that.
If you look at CR, you can tell which pages are Honda and Toyota pages by
the dominant colors. Those two automakers, while not quite perfect, have
been v-e-r-y consistent and consistent across all their products. This is
important. Ford can have a great frist year with the Fusion but they're
going to need several years of consistent performance to build trust. And
some of us are going to look at the other Ford models when deciding what to
buy, so Ford's got some work to do there, too. Why? Well, suppose they
switch production at one plant from <whatever> to Fusions? Or changes plant
managers or the engineering team or the QC team... or any kind of changes.
What happens to quality? If Ford has a consistent "quality ethic" that
shows across their entire product line, then you know that when they make
changes they're going to do them right.
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
I am having a hard time understanding this comment. I thought Ford
went overboard on the weather stipping. They not only have the sandard
door frame to door stripping, they also have an additional section
that fills in the gap between the edge of the door and the roof / A /
B / C pillars.
Yes, my point exactly. CR briefly reported that info, which made
their favorite cars look bad, so they stopped reporting it. Some
people would like to know BOTH bits of info. It's nice to have a
'reliable' car but if you have to choose between a Chevy that will
break down once every two years and cost you $300 to fix, versus a
Mercedes that will breakdown every 3 years but cost you $3000 to fix,
you might well decide the "unreliable" Chevy is a MUCH better deal.
Keep in mind, that the actual difference in the amount of problems on
most of these cars is quite trivial despite how CR makes them look
with all the black dots.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.