Let's see you call me an anti-CR zealot and I say your response is rabid. Think about that for a moment. Now who's making the personal attack? That would be you.
Your post consisted of quite a bit more, but you trimmed it from the quoted material. I am in no mood for these childish usenet games.
Let's see, you opened up with insulting me, calling me an anti-CR zealot, etc and so forth. Pot-kettle-black.
I don't expect anything. I could go through an issue of CR and say how their tests aren't correlated to the real world,etc and so forth and it would be a pointless excerise because you'd just go to the next level of denial... I've done this dance before and don't care enough about CR to spend the time *AGAIN* on it. Yes, this is an old topic, and in years past I went through the detail as did others.
At least you admit you're a religous CR zealot. So, that means you haven't been insulted in any way.
The way you lashed out at me indicates otherwise.
I am sure the lloyd parker CR threads of the mid-late 1990s are in the google archive if you want to do the research and get up to speed. With each passing day, usenet re-runs become less and less interesting.
Buh-bye.