Re: 2.0 Zetec vs. 115hp TDCi

Jun 30, 2003 5 Replies



> >
> >>
> >> TDCI 0-60 10.6 seconds
> >> ST170 0-60 7.9 seconds
> >>
> >> ST170 looks faster to me.
> >>
> >> The TDCI engine may produce more torque but because of it's extra tall
> >> gearing, it has nowhere near the torque the ST170 has at the wheels
> >> where it counts.
> >>
> >
> >In a comparison of three "quick" estates, a German magazine compared the
> >ST170, the Opel Astra OPC and the Skoda Octavia RS. The ST170, as you said,
> >posted a good 0-60, but it's in-gear acceleration times were terrible. > >
> >
> What are we talking about here. 30 - 50 in 6th?

It was 50 - 70 mph in top and 5th. Anyway, the ST170 is in a whole different price class than the TDCi, and beyond what I want to spend. A fair comparison would be the 2.0 Zetec to the TDCi, which was my original question.


Stephen


Swiss alpine passes are a large part of my driving. I'm starting to get bored of winding my MX-5 or Corolla GTi out in every gear to make decent progress.

Thanks for the valuable comments.

Stephen

*************************************

!!

You are a very, very lucky chap, indeed! :)

Enjoy whatever Focus you get - let us know how the TDCi does in the mountains! ;)

prolly will be better than petrol car cos the turbo counteracts the lack of oxygen at higher altitudes. (more or less) so performance will remain strong.

Tim..

Diesel engine is heavier than gasoline. When I was in the Ford dealer, a girl came with his 2 weeks old car with problems in the front brakes. I looked at the rear and of course it was a tdci. Don´t ask me what it is, but it is like this.

40 - 60kg maximum. If that is the true cause of the discs wearing prematurely, Ford has bigger problems in their design team to worry about. I highly doubt it, or shall we all leave our passengers at home?

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required