well, let's be honest here, a Corrado was unreliable from the start.
It's not a typical "import" it's practically an "affordable" exotic.
The experimental, not-ready-for-prime-time supercharger that needs
rebuilt every 80K miles or less is just the tip of the iceberg.
Then why all the stories about intake gaskets etc? I've never had to
replace any engine gasket on any VW (except for the oil pan gasket on
the Corrado when I did the rod bearings.) And I've never heard of any
"typical" problem that results in oil/coolant mixing as a matter of
course on any VW. (they did have an oil/water oil cooler on some
performance models that supposedly could allow this to happen, but I've
never heard of any failing without a lot of miles and/or neglect.)
It still has that typical German car thing where it's always worth
fixing - the basic mechanicals just keep going and going, everything is
rebuildable (yeah, for a price) even though it's the cheap ass ghetto
Porsche I can't imagine ever saying "man, my car's 20 years old... I
better get a new one before this one leaves me stranded."
Well, to be fair, most of the problems I have with the car are
ergonomic, so they're not going to be counted as "defects." It still
makes me hate the car with a passion, however. Only 7K more miles to go
until I can get something different!
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
The intake gasket debacle only applies to the 3.1L and 3.4L engines. GM has
produced more than just those two engines over the years. It does represent
one of the greater disappointments from GM in that they had many years to
make good on that design and instead foisted it on the public for way too
If one does a search they will discover, gasket problems like, the previous
pealing paint problems, were caused by the US government, not by any of the
domestic or import vehicle manufactures, or the gasket and paint
manufactures that made the paint or gaskets.
The government in its infinite wisdom chose to ban the use of asbestos and
certain paint processes on dates certain, without allowing the gasket and
paint manufactures sufficient time to develop suitable replacement materials
with field testing. The result was the buyers were left to do the field
tests in the vehicles they purchased. The result was buyers blamed the
manufactures that use two of the four gasket material that were not up to
the task. Those that used the one that failed early on were covered by the
vehicle, manufactures warranty but those that used the other mater that
failed around 70K had to wait until Ford litigation with the gasket
manufactures was settled out of court to get relief.
Unfortunately many still blame the vehicle manufactures, not the environuts
for those problems because the vehicles they bought were NOT made in the US
and were still using asbestose
FORD didn't have the problem.
Chrysler didn't have the problem.
And GM let the problem drag on for.......
HOW MANY YEARS ?
So much for GM engineering/manufacturing expertise.
And GM owners are STILL being screwed by the
failed manifold gasket problem !
You obviously did not do a search, since you don't know what you are talking
about.. Ford did indeed have a "problem" as well as all the others that
made cars in the US, Chrysler Toyota and Honda. It was Ford, who started
the litigation against the gasket manufacturers that led to the out of court
settlement and the resulting extended warranties by GM, Ford, Chrysler,
Toyota and Honda for gasket related problems. LOL
And that sir, is what turned me from being a died in the wool GM bigot after
35 years of owning GM vehicles. The manner in which GM continued to foist
their design flaws on the consumer just got to be unacceptable.
You just don't get it do you? It was not a design flaw. I was a material
failure. According to the out of court settlement with Ford the gasket
manufacturers agreed the failure of gaskets, after asbestos was removed, was
a result of the gasket manufactures not meeting the design specs of the
gasket made for the various vehicle manufactures.
The resulting settlement led to extended warranties being issued by the
various manufactures including GM, by which the gasket manufactures would
pay 80% of the cost and the vehicle manufacturer 20% of the cost of repairs
directly relate to gasket failures including engine failures. If for some
reason your particular vehicle was not repaired it would have to be that it
was beyond the 100K, ten year, extension of the warranty.
If you owned one of the Toyota or other maufacturers vehicle on which the
gasket had failed you would now be mad a Toyota etc. for the wrong reason
just as you are mad a GM for the wrong reason. The person you should be
pissed off at is your Congressmen who voted to ban asbestos, on a date
certain, rather than allowing the gasket manufactures time to field test the
alternative materials. ;)
You're the one who does not get it Mike. When the problems first surfaced,
they were a materials problem. Over 10 years later, when GM continues to
have the same problem for lack of a design improvement, it's a design flaw.
You appear to be a bit slow but you certainly are entitled to your own
opinion however your information is not correct. The basic design of
gaskets has been the same for years. Except for configuring a gasket for
individual application the basic way to build the gasket has not changed in
years, the only thing that has changed is the material used in gaskets. If
you doubt that take a look at the head gasket on a prewar car. The head
gaskets that failed did not have a change in the way they were built, the
"design" as you call it did not change and the specifications did not change
before asbestos or after asbestos when the were made with alternate
materials.. The same gasket worked fine with asbestos and two of the four
material used after asbestos was ban, did not work, it's that simple. The
vehicle manufactures had no control over the material the gasket
manufacturer used to meet their specs. If you still do not understand that's
Mike - you have continued to demonstrate your ignorance on this point for
months now. The gasket issue at hand is not a head gasket issue. It's not
an asbestos issue. It's the issue with the intake manifold gaskets. The
aftermarket succeeded in supplying a superior gasket, while GM was still
shoving the same old stock into their 3.1's and 3.4's. They had over a
decade to make good on that particular problem and simply did not. Take
your repeated carping of the same old tired line - which is irrelevant by
the way, and tell it to the wall.
Duh you continue to demonstrate you don't know what you are talking about, a
gasket, is a gasket and my reference has been to gaskets of all types and
the MATERIALS used in their construction. I previously referred to some
worked and some did not, dummy
contrary to what you choose to believe GM had a recall on the intake
manifolds as well, if your vehicle did not qualify because of mileage of age
that your problem.
Newer intake manifolds do not requires the heat resistance of the gaskets of
old. Intake manifolds today contain air, not the fuel mix that needed to be
kept heated when engines used carburetors. Why any sensible person would
judge how all the renditions of a vehicle of a particular brand, albeit it
good or bad, by one that they may have owned is somewhat foolish at best, in
any event. Why are you always disparaging GM in a GM NG if you no longer
buy GM products, is the better question one might ask LOL
Mike - your repeated attempts to sound informed on this are an utter
failure. GM did not experience head gasket failures. If this were a
materials problem of the sort you keep babbling about, they would have.
But - they did not. They experienced intake gasket problems because they
continued to use the same gasket desing for over 10 years despite the near
100% failure rate of these gaskets. It is not a materials problem.
I might not be informed on the matter of a recall but I do not remember any
recall on the 3.1 and 3.4 for intake gaskets. Please provide proof of this
statement. These manifold gaskets failed anywhere from 20,000 miles on up,
and GM did not universally stand behind them. At best, owners with 40,000
miles were sometimes fortunate enough to get a Goodwill contribution out of
GM, but even that was not a warranty - did not cover the costs, and was
dependent upon the dealer persuading GM to do so.
What do you call newer? This was a problem throughout the life of the 60
degree engine. It most certainly was true of the newer engines. 3.1 and
3.4 engines built right up to the end suffered this gasket failure.
Mike - you continue to throw out irrelevant points. Please do some research
on the GM intake gasket problems. You'll make yourself look less foolish.
You keep presenting the same convaluted opinion.
I'm not going to continue banter back and force with you over the same
subject, you are free to believe whatever you choose. What you choose to
believe is wrong. As I posted before, when I owned my fleet service
business we submit many a claim to every manufacturer the made cars in the
US for several years. They all were paid under warranty or extended
warranties for defected gaskets and covered the claims we submitted. If
you had a complaint and could not collect it has to be that you were outside
the warranty or extended warranty time and mileage parameters. What I have
presented are facts not opinions, if you want to continue to believe
otherwise that up to you...
If your reading comprehension wasn't so low you would see that GASKET
MATERIALS is exactly what I WAS TALKING ABOUT. Is english not your fisrst
Can you try it again in english, retard.
Well make up your mind, are you talking intakes or gaskets. Or are you so
senile that you don't remember what you were talking about ? In your post,
which I replied to, YOU were talking about gaskets. My reply was on the topic
of gaskets. NOW, YOU are talking about intakes. Pay attention to your own
See above, the topic is GASKETS, not intakes. Pay attention to the subject,
you are off topic again.
> Why any sensible person would
Jumping to conclusions again, Einstein ?? Or just pulling shit out of your
ass, as usual ? I work on cars everyday, been doing it for about 25 years.
When I make a comment on this gasket problem my comments come from hands on
experience. Like you have been told by most people here before, GM has a
gasket problem that has gone on now for ten years or so, that is a fact that
you choose to ignore. The problem affects tens of thousand of vehicles, not
just one, moron. So you see I am not judging things by one vehicle, eh
Einstein. And on the engines affected by this gasket problem, EVERY SINGLE
VEHICLE is affected, usually MULTIPLE TIMES. So for the customer this gets to
be an EXPENSIVE REPEAT REPAIR.
> Why are you always disparaging GM in a GM NG
Show me were I am disparaging GM ! I am simply stating facts, you do now
what facts are, don't you....... nevermind.
How did you jump to that conclusion ?
The better question would be why are you here defending GM, you're a Ford
man. Every time someone mentions this GM gasket problem you come in here and
try to cover it up like it didn't exist. In fact, you come in here to defend
GM anytime someone posts about a large scale problem with a GM vehicle. You
make yourself look like a fool because everyone here knows these are real
problems. If you don't like what GM related info gets posted in a GM newsgroup
you can always go to the Ford newsgroup.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.