I am looking at purchasing a used Chevy Astro cargo van for work in a
small business. I have seen several that have solid bodies and cabin
what I would think are extreemly high miles for a V-6.
ie: 1997 Astro with
Should I just assume an engine rebuild or replacement on this vehicle
could it last a while longer depending on care and driving style?
I know there
is no way to actually say how long it will last but I
guess I am looking for
some experienced opinions on what these
powertrains can actually do.
> I am looking at purchasing a used Chevy Astro cargo van for
> work in a
> small business. I have seen several that have solid bodies and
> but have what I would think are extreemly high miles for a
> ie: 1997 Astro with 239K.
> Should I just assume an engine rebuild or replacement on this
> or could it last a while longer depending on care and driving
> I know there is no way to actually say how long it will last
> but I
> guess I am looking for some experienced opinions on what these
> powertrains can actually do.
> Thanks alot.
High milage is okay if they are maintained properly as I have seen gas
engines go past 300K and if it runs good now and no burning oil and
will not blow up over night. My bigger concern is tranny because if it
has not been rebuilt in last few years it maybe be on last legs so if
you buy it get it dirt cheap so you can afford a tranny if need be.
YOu maigh also check to see if it has had front end work on suspension
because if no it is surly worn out and another reason to pay peanuts
for it. The 4.3 is based off of 350 which is a solid proven motor
Posted using the http://www.autoforumz.com interface, at author's request
Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
I drove both the Astro at work and 94 Safari AWD currently for personnel
use. The Safari looks the same at a glance but it is far tougher. The
Astro has a unitized body (no frame) I was told that the GMC version is
built on a S10 frame. I just finished hauling 55 boxes of floor tiles at
40 lbs each 200 km........my Safari awd had no problem AT ALL good thing
the cops never caught me was way over on my load limit. The door handles
on both models are flaky and have to be handled with kit gloves. Never
slam the doors keep them lubed and the sliding door track clean. With the
mileage that you are talking I would replace most of the sensors mainly
the o2 . I have seen these V6 engines with well over 500 k and still
running. The V6 is virtually a GM small block with two chopped of
cylinders. I also discovered that the Flapper inside the intake top
(forget what its called) was seized. If I remember right it's only
purpose was to balance the air intake from side to side while flooring
it. My O2 sensor was badly clogged but I never got a check engine
light....the only reason I looked at it was the mileage was a bit out. I
now get 22 mpg Cdn. 1 mile better than EPA rating. From my expieriance
the Astro was the womans too and from the day care and the Safari is the
mans too and from the hardware store.
For sure in 94
I am wondeing myself about other years. I know for sure my 94 Safari has a
frame and hauls one hell of a load I love it. I also use it for hauling
fire-wood filled it to the dome light last fall....my guess about 3.5 cords of
wood .....took pictures of the wheels up inside the wells lol
u c c wrote:
Astro and Safari are and have always been the exact same vehicle, except for
nameplate, and probably a few options. They have always been a truck
platform vehicle, never a "minivan". I found this on the 'net, telling of
some information and changes that happened through the years:
"And like the Energizer Bunny, these vans kept going, and going, and going,
surviving a 20-year lifespan with only minor changes and updates. Despite
the different names, GM never bothered setting the two apart in any way.
They were identical mechanically, cosmetically, and in price from the
I stand corrected.....I never bothered to really check before. I guess they both
have a frame chassis hmmmm the bastard lied to me. Any ways I have driven both
and my brain still tells me that GMC is far more manly than asstro
Steve Mackie wrote:
"Opinions about these vans' reliability are mixed. On one hand, Astro/Safari
gets a dismal reliability score in the 2003 Canadian Automobile Association
Autopinion Vehicle Ownership Survey. On the other hand, Consumer Reports
gives 2000 and newer models an average reliability score, citing durable
major mechanical components. Older models received significantly lower
ratings. Whatever the case, Astro/Safari contains proven mechanical
components shared with several other General Motors light trucks, so
replacement parts should be affordable and easy to find."
ok I will give ya a break witch arm?
I dont know why but it just is............I have driven about ten work
ASStros and for some reason the Gmc Safari just feels heavier and
stronger.....when I bought mine used the guy told me that it had a frame
and the Astro didnt...........I never bothered to look into it. What I can
see now is that the GM version of mini van in its class compared to the
ford and dodge minivan was the only one that had a frame instead on the
uni-body anyways last time I looked mine has about 260k km's
I add about 1 liter of oil evrey 7 tanks go for about 10 -12k km's between
changes (abuse) never had to add a drop of any other fluids over load it
all the time and drive the snot out of it.........I have driven the dodge
crapovan at work as well and hated it.
My 92 astro had 347,000 km as was still running great with no rebuild on the
motor or tranny. My 2003 however has 100,000 km and everything is coming
apart. Quality is down, the door handles continue to be a problem and the
gas mileage is 17km per gal. I suppose I'd buy another one because nothing
else fits my needs.
Thanks for all your replies. Good pints on checking the front end. I
when I have to worry about the tranny. Seems they can go
sometimes. Hard to choose when looking for a
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.