Along I5 there are many vacant fields, some with sheep on them, as
never seen even ten years ago.
There is also crop selection for lower-value crops that can at least
do without water, as I understand it in many cases water is not
available in the amounts needed at any price - at least at any price
that any food crops can be grown.
i haven't seen many at all. in fact, the ones that are are the ones
with big political drought signs on them so i wonder if they're more for
show than reality. as i say, the 99, the 5's older sister, is lush,
green, and still in full production mode from what i can tell.
yes, and sheep need water.
i remember when there were hardly any fields on "the 5" - it used to be
desert and tumble weeds both sides.
well that's much more likely. i'm all for agriculture, but when i see
fields literally submerged with run-off forming rivers, i think it's
grossly irresponsible and should be strongly discouraged. less thirsty
crops make much more sense - water is a finite resource. if it hadn't
been for the great damming and irrigation schemes of the 30's and 40's,
the valley wouldn't exist as it does now. and we sure as heck wouldn't
be able to get the political consensus to start on such visionary
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.