Had my 2004 Accord EX4 sedan in for 20k mile service (oil change and lots of checkups, as I recall), and the dealer said the front brakes were fine, but the *rear* brakes needed replacement. I just said yes.
In retrospect, isn't that odd, that the back brakes were gone so early? Should I have raised a question if anything was wrong, or if they should even be replaced under warranty (was like $175 at dealer prices, IIRC). It's been 95% LA freeway driving the last six months, not very aggressive, hey it's an EX4!
Thanks.
J.