Yes, I hear that, and more frequently than I would prefer. But my own Kia dealership is also my Hyundai dealership, and their reputation is about the best of any in town (and deservedly so). But I also have two other dealers within 50 miles. One is also a combined Hyundai/Kia dealership with a lousy reputation (also well earned), and the other have separate Hyundai and Kia franchises, with the Kia people having a bit better rep than the Hyundai people.
I've said it before. You would think by now that car manufacturers would have learned that service reputation is EVERYTHING these days. But apparently not.
My Amanti is much roomier on the inside than the Hyundia. The materials
> seem to be fitted slightly better and I look at both VERY closely before
> buying the KIA. Because of the added room I choose the KIA brand in spite
> of the dealership. The KIA dealership has a well earned POOR reputati>> I was listening to the radio this morning and there was an advertising
>> promo show from World Kia here in Las Vegas. The main theme
>> of the program (other than selling Kia's), was that Kia was the
>> premium brand, outdoing the Hyundai as far as luxury and quality.
>> I thought it was the other way around, that Kia was the entry level
>> vehicle from the Hyundai-Kia corporation in Korea.
>> I guess it was sort of like the relationship between Chevrolet and
>> Buick was for a while in the old days. Can someone please clarify >> this?