Got a phone call from the Jeep Dealer tonight...

The one they took back, is it the one that the name tag was there for?

What a huge disapointment to get something special like that and have it be no good.

Why did you get rid of all the others?

having more money than sense. :-) looking back i should of just hung on to my '00 sahara. i factory ordered my last '05 rubicon, and traded it 3 months later on a new work truck that i needed so that i can pay cash for my next new jeep.

He got pissed at Daimler Chrysler, after they sued him for stealing their trademark. Then like a silly little bitch in a VH1 reality show, he cut off his nose to spite his face, selling his Sahara for a fraction of what he had in it. I saw the pictures too. The Sahara was barely broken in.

Earle

stop lying earle. you cling to detail when it suits you, and conveniently forget it when it doesnt. it is not possible to steal a trademark.

unlike some in here (no names mentioned), im not a one hit wonder. im consistent for the duration which allows me to buy a jeep any time i want one.

So what IS the story with DC???

You swore up and down you would never buy another Daimler Chrysler product, ever.

Earle

It's on Google,

and i changed my mind. your point?

see

Under the category of things that make yo go hmmmmm....

Thanks for showing it to me, now I know.

Kate

It should be totally obvious, but here goes.

This establishes a pattern of behavior. You made that assertion in the first place, to get others involved in your ridiculous crusade against Daimler Chrysler. (Lord knows, I have been involved in enough ridiculous crusades myself, but Good Good Man, next time pick an opponent who deserves your hatred.) It establishes, that you get angry and don't think clearly. Now we are all human, and all of us do this now and then, but you are an extreme case. You have a short fuse, and if I were you, I would do something about it.

Earle

Yeah, but that video shows only part of the story. It played out in this forum ad nauseum...

Somehow, I have no trouble whatsoever believing this.

um, you somehow missed it when many were talking about raising money for the $70,000 attorney fees (i was going to school at the time) and how i thanked them kindly but declined the offer. i didnt want anyone else "involved". did i spread the word? youre damn straight. we both know there was more to it than copyright issues.

it WAS jeep related conversation. sheesh.....cant win either way. ;-)

nah....her eyes bugged out like a frog. :-)

That Atlanta (?) lawyer they sicced on you was pretty hot, wasn't she?

Earle

Hey, at least that one was Jeep related... Not what one would ordinarily think of when someone says "topless Jeeps," but still Jeep related...

/herb