Virtually ALL the automotive market filters are IDENTICAL in retention performance. Its not the fancy paint job on the canister nor the marketing hype that retains particulate but the resinated filtration media inside the filter. Since ALL filter manufacturers PURCHASE the filter media from essentially the SAME paper mills (depending on the best price at the time) how can there be any difference?
If the filtration media is essentially the same, the ONLY functional difference of importance is the **internal surface area of the filter media**. So.... if you want the BEST filter, buy the LARGEST (cheapest) filter that will fit. .... and change it often.
All the automotive filter comparisons on the 'web' are quite 'laughable' on a technical basis and do not compare actual particullate performance nor retention ability. If you want the BEST, buy the LARGEST that will fit, but cheap and often.
This is recirculation filtration (if the particle doesnt get trapped the first time, it will get captured the next pass or the next, etc. etc. etc.. If you had enough volume or surface area, you could use compressed pubic hair as the filtration media to do the exact same retention job.!!!!!!!!!!
respectfully submitted by a 'filtration' engineer.