Auto/semi-auto

I'd mostly agree,with one exception: I had a BMW 120 auto as a courtesy car. You're right: I got bored of selecting gears (no paddles, but a bump up/bump down autoshift), but got into the habit of using manual top gear on the motorway, otherwise every time you put your foot down (unless *very* gentle), it would drop gears. A right PITA.

Reply to
Chris Bartram
Loading thread data ...

I remember those too. I think some semi-autos had a pedal you blipped to change the gear after preselecting it with the lever.

Reply to
Chris Bartram

Me too, also to lock the car in gear when anticipating (down) hills or bends etc to stop the car running away. A multistory car park a prime example.

Reply to
adder1969

I drive both, and now both cars are diesel I would certainly avoid diesel manuals as the constant cog swapping to stay where the power is becomes a pain, with a petrol engine it adds to the experience plus the sound of the car hitting the limiter in every gear adds to the enjoyment, but diesels don't have that.

Diesel auto is a great combination - and should also ensure a long engine life too.

Reply to
Tim S Kemp

The hand-wash does it better.

Reply to
David R

I thaught preselector boxes.were quite nice to use. They had 3 conventional pedals, but the 'clutch' pedal was actually the gearchange pedal. You simply selected the gear you wanted with a small lever, usually sprouting from the steering wheel hub, but nothing happened until the change pedal was depressed. so once in top gear, you'd normally select the next gear down so it was ready for a hill or for overtaking, with just a dip of the change pedal. I drove a couple of pre-war Armstrong Siddeleys with preselector boxes, and I quite liked the idea of preselecting whatever gear you liked before it was needed. IIRC they were also fitted to Lanchesters, and certainly to the 50's Daimler Armoured Car. Mike.

Reply to
Mike G

I agree. My present car (as you know!) is a diesel auto, as was my last. The best of both worlds - the ease and convenience of an auto - but with the fuel consumption of a petrol manual.

Uno-Hoo!

Reply to
Uno-Hoo!

The message from "Uno-Hoo!" contains these words:

I adored my diesel auto - right up to when the auto died!

Reply to
Guy King

Likewise, never driven anything with a CVT but have driven autos. With a standard automatic, the har will hold position or creep as you release the brakes, but with a CVT I believe it'll roll forward until a certain amount of loud-pedal is applied. :-)

Reply to
Thingy

Not all CVTs. Nissan's N-CVT (Nissan CVT, cunning marketing, eh?) doens't creep forward at all. I've driven one a few times in the past. Horrible interior on the 1995 poor-man's model, but can't fault the gearbox, which was going strong after 100k. Impressive in fact.

CVTs get a bad name because non-Japanese designs are used, plain and simple.

Reply to
David R

Sorry, possibly being unclear there - I meant standard autoboxes creep (or hold position on an incline), CVTs don't. At least as far as I know. This, I understand is what causes problems faffing around on hills.

Reply to
Thingy

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.