Not just UK, but the Why is the big question. I have a company car, so no choice but if I did have one it would be auto. Wife has had several small autos. Won't drive my car 'cos it's not. I think autos are brilliant. Why doesn't everyone have them? Slight increase in fuel consumption?
The US is thougth of as being all auto but I was suprised when I first went there how many manuals there were. Far more than I expected. When renting I had to specify I wanted auto, default was manual.
The king of auto is Australia. Virtually unheard of for a car to have manual. If you want a manual you get a "Ute" (translates to 4x4 or SUV). If you buy a car manual is an optional extra that you'll pay more for, opposite way round to here.
You get used to it with time. A rental period probably isn't long enough. You get to be able to predict when it's going to change and it start to do it when you want.
The only time I've found an auto a pain was driving up and down mountains in Tasmania. Car was a 5 speed auto and it went up and down the box like a yoyo as I went round the hairpin bends. Solution: manually select the gears. On that box you could select any of the five manually.
Never had one fail yet and have had some pretty old grotty ones, eg a Micra K10 which cost =A390. Box was perfect and still was when I sold a year later.
You have a fluid flywheel which is slipping all the time. That generates heat which is a loss. However, all the autos we've had lock the fluid flywheel when up to a certain speed, eg had three Micra K10s and they all locked at 42mph. Locked up... no slip... no loss in economy. So on the motorway consumption OK, round town not so good.
I believe so.
I'd go for auto, but it's personal. I guess plenty of other will tell you why you shouldn't!