Your statement was phrased in the language used by science, religion and advertising - "nothing to do with", "everything to do with". Only science likes to explain how it reaches those conclusions.
You *need* to know what conditions things like to grow in, how fast they grow and what kills them. Common sense can't help here.
Common sense is often indistinguishable from religion. Advertising is often indistinguishable from the ramblings of idiots.
It was necessary to establish where you were coming from.
The symptom (it smelt) happened. That is not a required assumption.
The solution (making sure it was dry) seemed to work. That is not a required assumption.
The problem is that the symptom and solution for your particular case does not lead you to the statement you gave: it's far too simplistic. Nor is it going to predict the scenario you gave.
Your statement only holds *if* the aircon is wet when parked. The solution you described was to try and dry it before parking. So by your own words, you're saying it is possible to park it in conditions where a smell does not develop.[1] As for suggesting that it takes 6 days to dry... Under such conditions (if such exist - don't guess, give some kind of basis), the low mileage car will also not dry out between journeys (so what length journey does it need to kill a day's growth?)
[1] Anecdote time -My previous car had done 10k in it's first 6 months and it was kicking around forecourts for another 6 months before I bought it. Did it smell when I bought it? What does your hypothesis suggest?
My current car had just 2K7 miles at 17 months. Did it smell when I bought it? What does your hypothesis suggest?