Current MOT retest regs

Apr 21, 2006 64 Replies

It didn't fail comprehensively and my idea of maintenance isn't just=20 changing the oil. The failure was a barely visible split that I couldnt=20 see until the car was in the air. Once it was there and the base was=20 well lit then it could be seen. Even the tester thought it was probably=20 just a small welding job. It wasn't until I got it home and started=20 prepping to do the job that I found it was even more serious. I could=20 have got it through a retest and maybe made it last a couple of years=20 longer. The car doesn't look like a heap. Even underneath it looks sound=20 unless you look very carefully. The MOT was an inspection that caught a=20 problem I missed and I'm glad it did.

Conor ( snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

Fifteen years ago. Now, look back at the words "These Days" in the post you replied to... and cogitate on the implications...

Agreed. In most cases if you check your car before you take it for a test you should pass. But there are things that people miss because they're difficult to see, or because they can't check them (how many people can check emissions accurately?).

What I was driving at was the people who don't even bother to check first. IMO they deserve to pay for their retests.

Thanks Adrian, I was going to leave him in his own little (dated) world but you put it more concisely than I could muster at the time.

J

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required