t to heat the elements??
Thanks for the suggestions Dafydd, it=92s very kind of you. To be honest I'= m just about on the point of giving up!!!
I have been working on the issues this afternoon though and followed your a= dvice. Your assertion that I was using one of the inadequate little test la= mps was correct, probably 5w, maybe even less!!
So I endeavoured to construct a higher power test circuit and used a 21w fo= g light bulb. Set it up and tested that it worked from a good ground (the o= riginal hrw tailgate ground) and the bulbs positive supply from the bulb ho= lder. It lit up brightly. I tested the 12v hrw supply electrode with said b= ulb. It didn't light, although with the little bulb it did, so you were cor= rect it=92s not outputting sufficient current. I also checked between each = of it's terminals and a close THICKER part of the element for continuity. T= he resistance was 0.9 ohms on both hrw terminals, so good continuity.
Ok, then I ran a wire from a 10amp bulb positive supply to the pos hrw elem= ent terminal and utilised the good ground that gave a positive on the bulb = test and proceeded to measure voltage across the element, not sure if that = was a good idea!!=20
Interestingly on the positive side of the element there was an approximate =
4.5v reading. Toward the neg side of the element across the horizontal fila= ments and toward the thicker perpendicular element part there was a progres= sive diminution of voltage terminating in about 0.5v very near the ground t= erminus.As Duncan the other contributor suggested I used the test lamp to test in p= arallel on the rear element it didn't illuminate.
Would, in your opinion, it be fair to conclude the pos wire supply side for= the terminal is producing inadequate current and I should consider a bypas= s from a reliable supply??
I don=92t know anyone else with a similar car unfortunately. Good for your= son to have an electrician as his dad to find that defective tailgate eart= hing!!!
Thanks ever so much again. Matt