Rover K engine cost.....?

Aug 16, 2004 73 Replies

OK, I'm going to refrain from offering my opinions on this thread, as cars are a personal choice and people tend to take criticism of their car personally, and I'd hate to offend the people on here whom I depend upon for advice! So I shall merely say that I think Rovers are good cars, and easily better (and less expensive to fix) than a lot of the so-called 'quality' foreign tat which I've owned.

Anyway, in the hope of helping the OP with his original question, and dragging this thread back from becoming a slanging match...:

You might want to try a specialist Rover breakers - someone like Viking will probably be able to do you an engine

formatting link
that, Best of British
formatting link
list a new1.4 K series motor for GBP 816. Is yours really that badly knackered that it's not fixable, though, or is that just what the local fred-in-a-shed mechanic claimed?

Brian.

If the block was damaged in an accident, surely the rest of the car is so badly mangled that it's not worth repairing?

I too wondered about the sort of damage that would write off a block in situ and leave the rest of the car at least repairable. Gunfight? Over enthusiastically laid speed bumps? Meteorite?

The block was speared by a pole from some railings....the car looks fine except for some small holes in the grille!!

The only other things that suffered were the rad and exhaust manifold...oh well....

'looks fine'

I'd want that checking on a jig, as anything that can break a block will have twisted bits of the monocoque way before the block gave way.

It doesn't take much to pierce a block with a sharp hard object. The block is usually only about 1/4 inch of cast iron, which will fracture easily.

Wasn't the ZX the equivalent 306, and yes think the above applies

Er, isn't the K-series all alloy?

Tim S Kemp ( snipped-for-privacy@timkemp.karoo.co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

As usual with PSA, the Pug range "facelift" coincided with a "new model" in the Cit range.

The ZX spawned the original 306, which got the 406-nose facelift at about the same time as the Xsara came out.

Same with the AX -> 106/"new 106" -> Saxo.

Can't that be tracked back though to something even more obscure

104-visa-205-ax-106-saxo kind of timeline?

Tim S Kemp ( snipped-for-privacy@timkemp.karoo.co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

No, the AX was a completely new pan, IIRC.

Ah yes, I'm thinking Talbot Samba aren't I...

Samba and Maxi in the same evening.... where's that Gin....

Possibly. If that is the case, replace the word 'iron' with the word 'alloy'

Erm....

1993 414SLi, 80,000K. Fitted towbar, towed 1 ton caravan with it for next two years (and I'm talking Penines in Lancashire, and Mid-Wales mountains, not easy motorways!), adding another 40K on the clock. Sold it with 122,000K miles and no engine trouble whatsoever. Gearboxes on the 1.4 are another story...

Mind you, when I bought the car I checked here on the NG for common problems and one of the first things I did was to flush the cooling system and fit a new radiator - maybe OTT but as I said, never any engine trouble at all, even under very heavy loads.

Darren

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required