I'd like to point out that the American car manufacturers, like most employers, offer health insurance as a benefit to their employees. Look at this chart
formatting link
and see what kind of comparative disadvantage this imposes on Detroit. (Also note that the data come from 2003; the disparity between the U.S. and the rest of the world has grown ebven worse since then.)
The per capita expenditure on health for the U.S. in 2003 was $6,711 and all American car manufacturers - in fact, all American businesses which provide health insurance as part of their employee benefits - paid proportionally. Meanwhile in Germany it was $2,983; in Japan, $2,249, and in France, which has what is regarded as the best health care on the planet, $3,048. Less than half for comparable or superior health care! Less than half!
The difference, of course, is that in these countries the citizens, through their governments, actually regulate the health care system for their benefit, whereas in the U.S. the insurance companies control health care in order to maximize their own profits. It's as though we had decided to privatize the roads, and there was a toll booth every five miles up and down every highway. The toll booth operators would be rolling in dough, and the rest of the country would grind to a halt.
Instead of worrying about what the UAW does for its members and how can we reduce their benefits to third-world levels, Americans should focus on restraining the out-of-control costs of health care for all citizens. We should start by dragging all those parasitical health insurance companies into the nearest ditch and shooting them in the head.
yrs WDK