A point Diablo avoids

Reader's,

Once again Jack runs away from his LIES to start a new thread. This has been a common practice for this asshole!

Jack KNOWS that he has been proven a FRAUD and a LIAR, but uses this excuse whenever he feels trapped!

Jack, the only one OBSESSING is YOU!

It's YOU, Jack, that can't handle the FACT of your own words:

Going back Jack, you made the absurd claim that there was an, "...absent proof of the usefulness of detaxing...".

-[Abbot-Mar 25, 2005 1:32am]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

The FACT is, Jack, I have proven YOU, once again, to be a LIAR!

It was pointed out to you that The Boston Tea Party was just one such example!

formatting link

Now you want me to prove the impossible! You want me to prove that the

18'th Century Founders were intimately aware of 21'st Century 'detaxing'.

Jack, you are completely delusional if you think that you fooled the Reader's here with your shit!

Jack, you are such a fool! There may not be anything explicitly written in the Declaration of Independence, but being the scholar that you are, please tell us what the rebellion was about and why the need for this declaration?!

While you're at it Jack, please tell us if you support the events of the Boston Tea Party or not, and explain your reasons.

Abbott the new detaxer) Diablo, you have been obsessing again on the > claim that the founders of my country were detaxers as we know them > today. > > The challenge is the same. . .show me one endorsement of detaxing as > we know it today in the founding documents they wrote and singed. . . > the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, Madison's Notes on > the Constitutional Convention the Bill of Rights or the Federalist > Papers. > > You have slunk away from this simple question on another thread. For > the sake of your embarrassment I have repeated the challenge in it's > own thread. > > [Readers will note that Diablo can't respond]
Reply to
·Diablo
Loading thread data ...

George Washington described those who engaged in the Whiskey Rebellion as having engaged in treasonable acts.

formatting link

Reply to
·Brian Rookard

And yet, the founders thought that one of the most important powers given in the new Constitution was the power to raise taxes.

They hated taxes so much that that was the first power listed in Article I, section 8. .

And one of the first acts passed by that first Congress under the new Constitution was to levy taxes.

The founders were hardly tax protestors.

Reply to
·Brian Rookard

They had been tax protsters when they were the victims of extortion; they became tax aficionados once they got their own hands on the levers of power.

--XCobraJock

Brian Rookard wrote:

.
Reply to
·XCobraJock

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.