another speeding post

Aug 18, 2005 39 Replies

jaywalking did you know that, in the quest for more speed camera's, they errected one at a spot where sooene comitted suicide by jumping off a bridge it was a road death on the statistics but it didn't involve a motor vehicle when there is a seperate list of figures for when it is the pedestrians fault then you will see that the figures are a lot lower you can spew any amount of facts to keep the "road deaths avarage 10 per week" but wheedle out those not caused by the driver and they will dramaticly drop to keep it in perspective, list the number of people who died IN a vehcile as passengers or drivers

Well explain it to me then. If what is said about concentrating more when going faster is true, how come all the rear end shunts in L3 on motorways caused by drivers not paying attention?

Rubbish. There are far too many obstacles to give a half clear run. Even though the speed limit is raised, cars still accelerate the same.

Prat.

They already can f****it.

Really? Everything suggests the population is getting older and that we've gone from 13 people supporting a single pensioner in taxes down to two in the next decade or so.

Ah - so that's the basis of your argument. You 'pay' for road use, therefore you have priority over others who don't?

Does this extend to those who pay the full tax having precedent over those who get the reduced one on small cars? And both those over old cars which are tax exempt? And then HGVs have priority over all?

So you want pedestrian crossings on every side road? And you'd legislate so only those may be used to cross the road? Do you ever walk anywhere?

Care to try again in English? ;-)

As soon as you say 'you' the argument fails. You need to know the numbers of drivers under 25 and the numbers over 25. Then you can work out the percentages so you can accurately say 'you'll be twice as likely' etc.

However, I think you'll find the insurance companies have already done the sums...

Easy they are all bored shitless doing 70. Not fast enough!

lol, he walked right into that one :)

Yep!

Now if he was doing 165 he would have eyes on stalks searching for ANYTHING in the way 2 miles ahead...

Heh, bad choice of question to someone in a wheelchair!

there are 22 million holders of driving licenses in this country how many people drive who are under 25? how many of them are over 25? i would suggest that there are a fiar proportion of them OVER that age if it was broken down into length of license held it would be much different

Really? M. Schumacher involved in a shunt today in the Turkish GP.

More than enough to recognise twaddle.

Perhaps even more to the point then if he had to make a de-tour to a pedestrian crossing on every side road?

So given no side roads have pedestrian crossings, quite a detour?

I'm sort of thinking that you know just how much effort would be involved if you shepherded pedestrians to designated crossings on every road. Not every pedestrian is young and fit - indeed many are old, and why should they have to expend the effort to walk much further in perhaps the pouring rain just to make life easier for speeding motorists?

I think you know the answer.

[...]

Indeedy, at 160+ everything your side of the horizon is of interest...

A

Exactly! I have been there rather a lot! There were no / less cameras in my drag /street bike days!

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required