They're engineered that way.
The current generation of Passat is in a very different league but it had to be.
Yup. Very much like my Saab 9-3. The Passat is a good choice for motorways, but less in its element on a B-road.
They're all like it, you pick how much understeer you want on power, add a little extra for the 1.9 TDI, and there's your choice.
Yes, although it's such a barge of a thing that it's what I expected, so I wasn't dissapointed. Went like the clappers in a straight line, was comfy and quiet, has a good stereo - perfect motorway tool; better than the passat, anyway.
Nooo, more comfy than the passat. Quite a bit more. And if you let the rear tyres down a bit, you could get the back end to swing a bit :-D
Given a choice, I'd take the A6 every time.
Hmmm 'kay.
Is this an older A6 or a newer one?
Down?!
Okay... that's unusual. In everything I've owned, I've increased the rears a little for some rear action, so to speak.
I know - it's going crazy. But get this - a Toyota Aygo is the same size, inside and out, as a late shape Vauxhall Carlton! Go out and measure them if you don't believe me. People won't think you're mad or anything.
Peter
Factory bi-fuel is a good choice, smaller petrol tank to make room for LPG tank so you still get spare wheel and luggage space!
Heh. Pillock.
*mutters* where did I put my tape measure..?
Older. Was a '96 I think. The generation following the 100, with the inline-5 140Bhp diesel lump.
Yup. Well, if you didn't pump them up for ages, then the back end would start to do stuff. :-)
Same effect, probably, except your way is probably better for the tyres.
I had an A6 V6 TDi Avant for a while.
Nice enough car but it didn't do anything particularly well, although the stereo could reproduce Jack Whites guitar on "Hello Operator" better than most.
Was pretty good on fuel though.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.