>> They are supposed to have an x86 based version of tiger, if they would
> >> ship it I would move across.
> >
> > Doesn't matter that it's x86 based, you'll still need Mac hardware to
> > run it - it's just that Apple are shifting from PPC to x86 CPUs next > > year.
>
> They were talking of launching an non Mac version to compete with windows, I
> can't see it costing much more to open it up and they get a new market.
Doesn't work like that.
OSX relies on knowing what sort of hardware it's going to be running on
- which is why it's so slick and stable. You don't get that when Intel box-shifters bung loads of cheap components together to make a Wintel machine.
Aside from that - Apple make far too much money from hardware to release a 'generic' OSX that'll run on any old Intel box.