This discussion of MPG is intersting, but I must question the accuracy of everyone's MPG measurements. Is everyone measuring accurately? How about driving style and conditions? One person's view of "highway" driving may be another person's view of "city" driving. I use a certain highway everyday that has traffic lights every 1/4 mile or so... it's a 55 mph "highway", but the stop and go will kill mileage... this may even be worse than slower stop and go.... etc. Also, how about driving style? Some people driving with a very heavy foot and consider that being "easy"... to them, "getting on it" means all-out drag-racing. In sum, I would not get too worked up if one person states they are getting 21 mpg and you are only getting 18 mpg or whatever. Chances are the cars are running in an identical fashion and get identical mileage. What about auto trannies verses manual trannies?... another big factor. How is one shifting? How about hills, wind, etc? How accurate are the gas pump gauges? In my opinion, here's one way of really getting a serious MPG measurement for comparison... take your car cross country and back... drive at a steady 70 mph the whole time. Record the amount of fuel you put in, and mileage driven, etc. Then, after traveling about 6,000 miles, do the calculation. This will be a VERY accurate measurement. I have done this with one particular car three times, and my calculation came out almost exactly the same each time... a `96 Monte Carlo,
3.1, V-6... at 75 mph all day long for 6,000 miles, got about 31.5 mpg. If and when I take the Stang cross country, I'll let you know what I get. "City driving" is so ambiguous that this could never be used for a mileage comparison in my opinion. If all these cars are running in tip-top shape, they should ultimately perform the same.