Ross
- posted
19 years ago
Ross
they changed the link?
Tryn this URL
In message , Ross writes
Looks pig ugly to me but I suppose you are paying for the performance and not the looks.
Looks better than most new cars! I know its not the same class but I was behind a new Golf the other day and thought at first it was yet another fat people carrier. Made my Mk2 look corgi sized. Bloody ugly as sin from behind.
I am not that thrilled with the outside looks, especially the big front duct on the hood but it's interior is great and the performance is wonderful. I much prefer the way the Evo looks and definitely the Evo's steering ratio (closest thing to a go-kart on the street), but Mitsu's in trouble and the resale on the Evo's is crap. When I worked for Mitsu as a sales rep the near-daily bulletins about which group of parts would be auto-denied on warranties became a joke. As much as I like the Evo, I just couldn't bring myself to buy one right now. The STi is virtually equal in every way of performance and with a better interior to boot.
I'm hoping to acquire one soon and it will be in something close to a gunmetal grey (forget the exact color) or the traditional racing blue. Yes, it will see autocrosses and track events when I can make them. :)
Was just in the dealership... He bashed out a great deal on the 04MY Sti as he needs to clear space for the 05s comming in at the end of the month. Im £1500 cheaper on the 04 as opposed to the 05. Plus hes giving me a few other bits and bobs.
Test drive on Saturday and possibly baaabye to my wrx!!!
R
"ADODB.Field error '80020009'"
links are still dead, but is it this one on the front page of..
Love the silver!
Some pics here for a few days: (1MB)
hmmm. There's still so much more that I don't like, than there is that I do like. Basically, from the side it looks like a very poor third-world country attempt at modern-day saloon car.
As has already been said though, you wouldn't be buying this car for its looks.
This is the same car we've had in the US since late 2003 as an 2004 model.
It's quite ugly. The 2002-2003 "Bug eyes" look much better and have a smoother integrated hood scoop. Supposed this design increases aerodynamics and cooling.
There are pics >Ross wrote:
The STi is a fine car, but it's not a BMW. Please, ensure that you post information or opinions on BMWs only in this newsgroup.
It was originally posted to uk.rec.cars.misc and alt.autos.subaru BMW never came into the equation.
See headers...
Path: news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: "Ross" Newsgroups: uk.rec.cars.misc,alt.autos.subaru Subject: New STi looks good... Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:28:48 +0100 Lines: 7 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: mailgate.mqgainsbc.co.uk X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1097137710 22366 194.217.132.254 (7 Oct 2004
08:28:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: snipped-for-privacy@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:28:30 +0000 (UTC) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Priority: 3 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Xref: news.demon.co.uk uk.rec.cars.misc:67230 alt.autos.subaru:47183Ross
Woosh!
yep.. that one went right over didn't it!!! :D
In message , Séan Connolly writes
Mind you, it took a while for the penny to drop for me.
The BMW group is a fine forum, but it isn't either of the ones to which the message was posted. Please ensure that you keep your BMW snobbery out of this newsgroup.
- Greg
Similar, but not the same eh?
Here's another concept...
Cheers, Jason (remove ... to reply) Video & Gaming:
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.