Looking at replacing the (failing-but-not-yet-totally shot) battery in my car.
Wondering what people's thoughts are on installing a marine (Deep cycle) battery instead of the more conventional "car" type battery.
Would you do it? If so, Why?
Would you run screaming in terror from the idea? If so, why?
Would you do it, but be on the lookout for trouble? If so, what kind of trouble?
I'm looking at the idea of going with a deep-cycle type because I semi-frequently do long stints of running a fairly large bank of spotlights and some video gear off the battery while filming deer at night. For reasons that should be self-evident, leaving the motor running isn't really a good option while shooting. Engine noise tends to make the subjects being filmed more than a little nervous and/or absent, and when it doesn't scare them away, has a definite effect of disrupting normal behaviors. (which is why the filming is being done - to try to document, as well as possible, just exactly what *IS* "normal deer behavior" in these parts.)
I'm in an area that only rarely sees temps below 40, and I can count the times it's gone below freezing in the past 6 years on one hand, with fingers to spare. (Assuming that may make a difference in choosing) The car is one with only a few electrical "toys", and is not computerized, unless you count the radio with the digital tuner in it as a computer. (which it technically is, but...) The car itself is a very easy starter
- It's extremely rare for me to need more than one attempt to get it to fire, regardless of weather or temperature.
So what's the primary difference between "normal" and "Deep cycle"/"Marine" batteries? Aside from the fact that standard starting batteries have a reputation for going belly-up when deep-cycled, while deep cycle types handle it better, that is.
Thanks for any input...