I HOPE THIS SCARES THE S%#T OUT OF YOU!!!
Jul 27, 2008
2 Replies
formatting link
The webpage from which came the above link:
formatting link
The moral: Flame-retardant treatments that work are cheap to produce. Flame-retardant treatments that work and do NOT intoxicate people are expensive to produce, but will cut down on long-term healthcare costs.
With all due respect, these people have made suggestions and raised alarms, but the case is far from solved.
Many times this sort of environmental group is alarmist rather than scientific in nature. In that they managed to spell "fluorescence" incorrectly, one might have slight misgivings.
If there are seriously detrimental chemicals involved, then by all means the situation should be remedied.
Horse hockey. There is a huge difference in flame retarding an arm rest versus a child's pajamas that might be chewed on. Their type chemophobia is annoying.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required