Re: {{ OT }} It's too bad JoeSpareBedroomInHisHead could not explain ...

Jul 16, 2008 2 Replies



>>
>>> >>>
>>>> ... why Iran would benefit from faking a display of its missile >>>> capability.
>>>>
>>>> It turns out that they displayed no new capability at all, which we >>>> already
>>>> knew. It also turns out that there is the appearance of PhotoShop >>>> editing
>>>> sessions in some or all of the videos.
>>>
>>> But the BBC said the US had missle tracking data for the launches! >>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I've heard that. I also heard that the reports out of Iran were false, and
>>look like an effort to destabalize the oil markets so that the price would >>go up.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Either way, Iran needs to be attacked.
>
> Sooner or later, we (or Israel) will.
>
> The best missile defense is an attack....
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida

Now we KNOW you are disconnected from reality, while your president has been kicked in the pants by his advisors and told to get connected with reality:


PARIS - The decision by the Bush administration to send a senior American official to participate in international talks with Iran this weekend reflects a double policy shift in the struggle to resolve the impasse over the country's nuclear program..


First, the Bush administration has decided to abandon its longstanding position that it will only meet face-to-face with Iran after it first suspends uranium enrichment as demanded by the United Nations Security Council.


Second, it infuses the negotiating track between Iran on the one side and the six global powers - France, Britain, Germany, Russia, China and the United States -- on the other with new importance, even though their official stance is that no substantive talks can begin until the uranium enrichment stops.


The presence of William J. Burns, the under secretary of state for political affairs, at the meeting led by Javier Solana, the European Union foreign policy chief, and Saeed Jalili, Iran's nuclear negotiator, in Geneva on Saturday brings with it both symbolic and substantive significance.


All of the Bush administration's negotiating partners, particularly the Europeans and the Russians, have been pressing Washington to join the talks. They welcomed the decision to send Mr. Burns as an important signal by the Bush administration, in its final months in office, that it is seeking a peaceful solution to the nuclear crisis and not moving toward military action against Iran.

Well, maybe Iran is the one dangling the carrot now. Increased oil production and lower prices will make everyone outside of the Middle East happy.

And if they could get their president to shut his trap for a whole year, it could make some oil speculators very unhappy, which would be a wonderful thing.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required