>>> dbu' wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> >When I present you with the video of the interview, then what? >>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's find out:
>>>>>
>>>>>formatting link>>>>
>>>>> It is at 4:21/8:50
>>>>>
>>>>> all the best,
>>>>
>>>>So, where was the alleged gaff? I watch 8:50 minutes and didn't hear
>>>>the remark that the anti-Palin crowd are harping about.
>>>
>>> Of course when seen/heard in context it makes all the difference. I
>>> fully understood what she was saying. What LMC and JSB are crying
>>> about is the juxtoposition of multiple ideas into one sentence. I
>>> think their brains aren't expansive enough to handle more than one
>>> thought at a time.
>>
>>
>> So far, two interviewers have had to stop her run-on sentences or the
>> interviews would've gone right down the toilet.
>
> Guess they couldn't understand it either. The comments you pointed out
> made sense to me.
No, they don't make sense to you because yesterday, you could not explain them. If she'd ended up talking to other world leaders, it would've been absurd to expect them to bring in linguists to rejigger her sentences and figure out what she meant. You only get ONE chance.