> >>>
>>>> Retired VIP wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>> All I know is as far back as
>>>>>>> when I was earning my Engineering degree, in the late forties, we
>>>>>>> were being
>>>>>>> told man was causing the world to COOL DOWN,
>>>>> snip
>>>>>>> The Engineer in me makes me
>>>>>> How about the climatologist in you, you know, the kind of people most
>>>>>> qualified to determine if the world is cooling or heating?
>>>>> snip
>>>>> A climatologist is a TV weather man, not a scientist.
>>>> TV weather reporters are typically only minimally qualified as
>>>> meteorologists and would not find work at NOAA. In contrast
>>>> climatologists and NOAA meteorologists are real scientists.
>>> Retired VIP is simply parroting what he's heard or read in the liberal
>>> circles to denigrate a true climatologist (an Associate Climatologist)
>>> that blew the whistle on data fraud in the state of Washington that was
>>> being used to "prove" GW and affect and effect national policy. >>>
>>> It's a Clintonesque technique of character assassination when someone
>>> scores a hit on your own credibility. One of the reasons many people
>>> don't believe the false science anymore. And in the GW so-called
>>> scientific community, speaking out against GW is equivalent to saying
>>> that the earth was not the center of the solar system or that salvation
>>> is by grace and not by works in certain periods of history. It is clear
>>> that the GW so-called scientific community operates like a dominant
>>> religion where truth no longer matters. People's livelihoods are at
>>> stake, and they will do anything to protect the religion regardless of
>>> what is true and what is not true.
>>>
>>> That's why you hear things like Gore's carbon offsets scam referred to
>>> as "indulgences" - a term used about the Catholic church for absolving
>>> people for everything imaginable as long as you donated money to the
>>> church. People find that kind of elitist crap disgusting - and it is. >>>
>>> If the people who believe in GW really believed it, they wouldn't have
>>> to fake data left and right like they're doing and wouldn't have to
>>> character assassinate people who speak out and expose the truth. >>>
>>> Bill Putney
>>> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
>>> address with the letter 'x')
>>
>> I find it funny that governments say they want to reduce...
>> whatever... and sign agreements to do this and that and then they just
>> continue doing what they have always done.... nothing that is.
>>
>> There is absolutely nothing wrong with carbon in any form globally.
>> Too much of it locally can be a problem.
>> Same with anything else.
>> Too much water and you drown.
>>
>> There is a problem in some areas locally with pollution and fish and
>> people do not fare well in it.
>> That has always been like that.
>> Rivers and lakes have been contaminated and sometimes they have been >> very poisenous.
>> It is of course not good for anyone to be drowning in pollution.
>> Blaming the pollution on carbon is most often wrong.
>> Blaming global warming on human pollution and carbon is stupid at best. >
> I suggest you find the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and read
> their reports. They did their homework.
>
> The concentration of CO2 has gone way up in the last two hundred years,
> and it is rising faster than ever. CO2 traps heat. Put those two facts > together.
>
> Jeff