Toyota's production up; gap with GM narrows

Toyota's production up; gap with GM narrows

formatting link
TOKYO - Toyota's global production last year surged 10 percent to more than

9 million vehicles, the Japanese automaker said Friday, narrowing the gap with General Motors, the world's No. 1 automaker.

Toyota Motor Corp., riding on its reputation for fuel-efficient cars like the Prius hybrid, produced 9.018 million vehicles, including its Japanese subsidiaries that make trucks and smaller models. It was its fifth straight year of growth.

General Motors Corp. and its group automakers' production rose to 9.18 million vehicles worldwide in 2006, according to the Detroit-based automaker - about 162,000 vehicles more than its Japanese rival.

That gap has narrowed from about 819,000 vehicles at the end of 2005, when Toyota and its Japanese units made 8.232 million vehicles worldwide and GM's production totaled 9.051 million.

Late last year, Toyota set a global production target of 9.42 million vehicles for this year, which is likely to put it ahead of GM, which does not announce production targets for the full year ahead.

Toyota has already long beat GM in profitability, reporting robust earnings, while GM has sunk into the red on massive restructuring costs. GM lost $3 billion through the first nine months of last year and lost $10.6 billion in

2005, but said it will report a profit in the fourth quarter.

Also Friday, data from automakers showed Honda Motor Co. had surpassed Nissan Motor Co. to rise to Japan's No. 2 automaker in annual global vehicle production.

Solid demand for the Civic model boosted Honda's production in North America and China, said company spokeswoman Yu Kimoto, as Honda achieved an all-time calendar year record for worldwide production in 2006.

Honda had been ranked second among Japanese automakers in 2003, but fell to No. 3 the last few years.

Global production at Nissan fell 7.7 percent in 2006 to 3.24 million vehicles, while Honda's worldwide production last year rose 6.6 percent to

3.63 million vehicles. In December, Toyota's global output totaled 624,219 vehicles, up 4.7 percent from the same month of last year for a 26th straight month of growth.

Overseas production edged up 0.1 percent to 285,931 in the 60th consecutive month of increase, while domestic production 8.8 percent to 338,288, the

16th straight monthly gain and a record high for December.

Nissan, which has an alliance with Renault SA of France, said global production in December fell 3.2 percent 238,332 vehicles with domestic output declining 6.9 percent and overseas production inching down 0.6 percent.

Honda said its global output rose 6.4 percent to 283,245 vehicles in December. Production in Japan posted a 14.8 percent gain while overseas output rose 1.2 percent.

Global production for Mazda Motor Corp. climbed 14.2 percent to 116,276 vehicles last month. For 2006, Mazda - 33.9 percent owned by U.S. automaker Ford Motor Co. - produced 1.285 million vehicles worldwide, up 12.1 percent from 2005.

Output at Mitsubishi Motors Corp. declined 3 percent to 109,960 vehicles in December. Mitsubishi's global production last year slipped 3.6 percent to

1.31 million vehicles.

-- "If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed,if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly,you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival.There may even be a worse case;you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory,because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."

---Winston Churchill

Reply to
Jim Higgins
Loading thread data ...

Thankyou Jim and thankyou Winston.

We should have been fighting the terrorists after the first WTC bombing. We wouldn't have had 9/11.

Reply to
dbu

Here I am reply to my own posting.

I post a non-OT topic and get only one reply. OT postings are multiple replies. Go figure.

Reply to
dbu

It was interesting but final in itself. Didn't seem to call for comment. Happens quite a lot on Usenet. Thanks for it, though.

(Now, had you slipped in some gratuitous insults of Demonrats or Republigoons, we could be enjoying a lively thread of nonsense.)

Reply to
Andrew Stephenson

Cheers Andrew, you seem like a fellow I'd have a beer with....

Reply to
dbu

The real stuff, I hope? There are some decent micro-breweries in the US these days.

Reply to
Andrew Stephenson

i think toyota ought to just go slow and not just crank out the cars to beat a target. if theyre selling? sure.

cranking em out, forcing em on dealers is a detroit trick, and just leads to crap quality and incentives to move the stuff thats been made.

Reply to
SoCalMike

and since 9/11 we should have been fighting terrorism in afghanistan, where the actual terrorists are.

Reply to
SoCalMike

Funnily enough, there was an "expert" on BBC-tv, two nights ago, who agreed with you. He felt that Ford (and thus presumably any car maker who wants to prosper) should switch to making a varied range of vehicle types that covers the likely needs of the focus market but restrict models within each type. This permits rapid ramping up/down of production as fashion and demand fluctuate; a production base that must be built before a market can be served is no bleeding use. How close to this ideal is Toyota already?

Reply to
Andrew Stephenson

Roger that.

What makes Toyotas good is they depart from the old Detroit in workmanship and sales tactics. Personally I want stability in price and in resale value.

Reply to
dbu

I suppose there are times the quarterback would like to take back that last pass that was intercepted.

I guess history will be the final judge.

Reply to
dbu

In the auto business, vehicle inventory is measured in days supply. Basically, days supply is calculated by measuring how many vehicles are sold over a given time period and dividing the number of vehicles sold during that time period by the number of days in the time period to arrive at average sales per day. The number of vehicles in the inventory is divided by sales per day to arrive at days supply. For example, if a dealer sells an average of 2 Camrys per day over a 120 day period and has 60 Camrys in stock, then the dealer has a 30 days supply of Camrys. The shorter the time period used, the more responsive an automaker can be in adjusting production. I don't know if this is still the case, Toyota used to use a

120 day time period. The advantage of a longer days supply of inventory is more choices for their customers, and automakers get to have the dealers carry the inventory and keep their production lines busy. The advantage of a shorter days supply of inventory is that dealers' cost of carrying the inventory is lower, gross profit margins can be a little higher, there is less exposure to the automaker and dealer if there is a sudden downturn in sales, and there are fewer vehicles to get rid of at the end of the production cycle.

Dealers generally like to carry a 45 to 60 days supply of vehicles. Dealer inventory of Toyota's most popular models are in the neighborhood of 30 to

45 days supply, while slower selling vehicles like the 2006 Tundra was closer to 90 at the end of 2006. Toyota is adding production capacity to meet consumer demand and bring dealer inventories closer to 60 days supply.
Reply to
Ray O

Thanks. Interesting. Though, when I ordered my Prius the delay was 12 weeks, IOW 84 days, including shipping from JP. They may already have built the thing by the time of ordering, of course.

Reply to
Andrew Stephenson

Toyota calculates dealer day's supply by counting vehicles that have either been allocated to the dealership or are in the dealer's inventory. Future production that has not been allocated to the dealership is not included in the dealer's days supply.

For a while, average Prius days supply was under 15, which makes delivery time for future production longer. Transit time from Japan to a dealership in the UK is probably 3 or 4 weeks; there can be a 1 to 3 week lag in getting an order into the production queue, and the rest of the time is waiting for previous orders to make it through the production line.

Reply to
Ray O

When I was Group Sales Manger, one of the first things I did was drastically reduce total inventory for the group. In some areas as much as 50%. Our import brands like Toyota had far fewer dealerships than GM and Ford. The partners were buying the old mom and pop stores, that were common with GM and Ford. I used them as inventory pools to supply our larger stores, that sold 500 a month or more, and knocked thousands off floor plan cost. In one case in PA we had four Ford stores within 15 miles of each other. I also relied more on the dealer pool. In our Lexus stores I could only carry eight or ten LSs per store. Rather than stocking 40 Camrys when I only needed 15, I could stock 20. The partners took notice when their floor plan costs were not ramping up that much, even though they were opening new stores in all six of the states in which we operated. ;)

mike

Reply to
Mike Hunter

Smart move, though I suspect that if you were able to reduce inventory by half, your floor plan savings were more than just "thousands," more like tens of thousands ;-)

How do Ford and GM allocate vehicles from the dealer pool? Do they replace inventory if a dealer has depleted their inventory more than other stores or do they require some kind of special promotion like Toyota?

Reply to
Ray O

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.