"Toyota's Sienna gets makeover to stay in game"

This article is horrible. The "makeover" was in 2004; so why, pray tell, is it being touted in mid-2006 as being meaningful?

This is nothing but a Toyota press release with a silly paragraph at the beginning. Does anyone doubt that the newspaper took money, one way or another, to print that drivel?

The article describes a 2004 event as red-hot May 26, 2006 news! Makes one wonder, if the author gets paid each time he gets Toyota into news print. I've read somewhere that the Washington Times is owned by the Reverend Moon's organisation (remember the "moonies" sect). Does anyone have details or can confirm this?

Nah, the Washington Times is a conservative Republican newspaper, and the Washington Post is a liberal Democrat newspaper (Warren Brown is the auto writer). How can liberal sbe rich if they're anti-capitalism and anti-business?

"Mike" wrote

Hmmm, why let ignorance get in the way of spouting (conservative) nonsense! According to the Wikipedia Encyclopaedia: "The Times is the flagship publication of News World Communications, Inc. (NWC). NWC was founded by the Rev. Moon, and some of its officials are members of the Unification Church he leads, a fact that has drawn some criticism and controversy." Get the details here:

Because they inherited their money or they are lawyers? ;)

mike hunt