14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?

Have a question or want to start a discussion? Post it! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View


Have tested this for about the past 6 weeks, I am getting about 14-15
MPG on my 1994 Thunderbird 4.6 liter version V-8.

I was getting in the low-to-mid 20s, unless I was really off on the
math back then.

So, was I just off on the math or does this car have some SUPER
SERIOUS problem going on now?

signed,
Very Confused and paying for gas out-the-ass


Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



try paying our petrol/(gas) prices, they went up again today to 93p/litre


Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



wrote:


We are at $1.08 to $1.10 Canadian per liter right now for regular in
Southern Ontario.
*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com  ***

Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



1.15 and going up in Montreal

http://www.essencequebec.com/accueil.php

(in french)
--

(\_ _/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.




<clare at snyder.on.ca> wrote in message


Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



 > On  4/18/2006 4:42 PM ...  BOB  wrote:

Could be the O2 sensor.

Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?





Or about 100 other things.

Jeff



Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



BOB wrote:

I would check for any vacuum/unmetered air leaks, especially intake
gaskets on a 1994.


Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



BOB wrote:

  Hey Bob,
  When was the last time the car got a good tune up? Plugs, wires, PCV, filters,
etc?
4.6s are tough on wires and in the T-Birds the motor mounts are really soft. You
may
have a dead miss that you didn't notice if it came on gradually. That drop is
about
right for one cylinder not firing. If you can't remember when the plugs and
wires were
replaced, just do it. Check for contamination in the spark plug wells. (oil,
coolant,
general slimy grundge...) This is an indicator of other concerns that also need
to be
addressed.

Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



If you ask me, I think that is probably about right. The gas milage
that is. a 4.6 is not a small motor. I have a 3.8 in a Taurus wagon of
the same year 1994. What are you doing with it? Is it mostly highway?
If it were mostly highway I would be concerned a bit more. Mostly
highway I could see 22 23 miles to the gallon. Mostly city and short
trips is going to take you into the 15 mpg range. You have to figure
more into things then a tune up or the o2 sensor. A lazy transmission
which it probably has by now will add to the mpg problems. In 12 or 13
years the engine is getting lazy too. It will not give the same mpg
that was posted on the sticker even with the best care. Being in Canada
it is colder then down here in the states and that has to make for
expensive cold starts. I know in the winter my car loves to burn fuel
on a cold start. How clean is your fuel system, dirty injectors will
cause problems also. Every two weeks or so I run injector cleaner with
the gas just to keep it clean. A tune up is worth a try too. How does
the engine run in general in your opinion? I don't think anyone checks
timing of the motor anymore but it is worth a look. I still don't
understand myself why these O2 sensors don't throw a flag as they used
to in the early days. At that time it was a preset flag, but I would
think today they could show health. Yeah at .50 a liter it didn't
matter! Smile... Should never have been a 3.8 or a 4.6 in 1994 with
exception to the trucks used for industry.... I had one only for
business.

Gerald


Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?





Read the plugs, while you are doing a tune-up.

And, of course, depends a lot on what sort of driving you do.  My 3.8 gets
22-23 with 2/3 hwy, 1/3 suburb driving.  All suburb, about 19-21.



--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!

Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



My guess is you are off on the math AGAIN. If you had a SUPER SERIOUS
problem, the vehicle would not run well. Many stations are adding more
alcohol to the blend and that could be a factor. During the hurricane
aftermath, outlets were allowed to sell blends they would not normally
be allowed to market. You might have been getting ALL gas for awhile
and not are back to an E10 blend.
I still say it's the math though.


Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?





An E20 blend (20% ethanol) would reduce gas mileage by about 5%, going from
20 to 19 mpg. That is less than what the OP describes. However, winter
driving could make a difference, especially if the tyres are low in air, and
the driver makes short drives without the motor being warm. Low tyre air
pressure and cold motors make cars less efficient. They also add oxidizers
to fuel (MTBE and methanol being two of the chemical that are used) in
winters to help prevent pollution. These also decrease fuel mileage.

Jeff



Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



wrote:


Well every time I fuel-up I get a nice printed receipt that shows
exact gallons purchased. It shows gallons to the 3rd decimal place
even. Also I reset the milage gauge at every fill-up I make.

If my math is off then perhaps I should buy either a new calculator or
get a refund for Microsoft Excel?

I don't see how I could be wrong. All you do is divide the miles
driven by the number of gallons required to fill the tank SINCE you
last reset the gauge and filled the tank.

I do however like a mystery, so if you could show me a 'new' method of
calculating MPG then by all means let me know.

I am always open to new ideas as it relates to division.

thanks.


Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



Are these the original size wheels/tires? gearing?





Re: 14 MPG? Uh, Is this Normal?



On Mon, 01 May 2006 21:42:02 GMT, "Grolch"



Site Timeline