David Short
- posted
20 years ago
David Short
Thanks for the replies...
Okay, so used in a relative manner, is it valid to infer that keeping the vacuum Hg higher during acceleration is the most efficient?
I notice that if I open the throttle 100% then the vacuum drops, then rises as the car accelerates... but if I slowly accelerate (without pedal to the metal) then the vacuum does not drop as much....
Right. It sounds like the originator may have his gauge hooked up to the incorrect or shared vacuum line.
The vacuum gauge (manifold pressure) shows a function of engine loading; sits around 17" Hg at idle and will go to near zero at very heavy loading like going up a hill in top gear; may approach 27" or so coasting. I have a VDO in my 5.0L and is interesting to watch when the cruise control is engaged.
Something else to take one's eyes off the road and rearview mirror.
Don
Craig Plesco opined in news: snipped-for-privacy@news.covad.net:
Yes... but not as much as in carbed models. Saab did a study years ago that showed "brisk"* acceleration (using same basic port efi as Ford) actually was more economical than slow acceleration.
Please bear in mind that:
I suggest you run a full tank using brisk then one using slow accel... see how much difference there is, I have -several times in several cars- and there just isnt that much difference. All the way from my SVO to 2L Probe (well, the Probe and SVO I used WOT a lot) to 3.8L TBird.. no more than .5 to
1 mpg.*Brisk is that which does not cause ECM to go to openloop mode. About 2/3 pedal
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.