Why did I buy a used Subaru?

Someone please tell me.

In late July, I bought a used 99 Outback Wagon, manual transmission, higher mileage, 120K. I didn't pay a lot for it, but having bought it from a dealer who stated that the vehicle had been thoroughly checked, I assumed that I had made a decent, at least moderately reliable, purchase.

Two days after purchase, I noticed the temp gauge climbing. No engine light, but after driving it a bit, I opened the hood, and the coolant was boiling. Dealer towed it, said the head gasket was blown and there was piston damage. They towed and repaired at no charge. Good.

Four weeks later, the engine starts sputtering and the check engine light comes on. Since the dealer is 40 miles away, I take it to my local mechanic, who has serviced other cars for me over a 10 year period and in whom I have a lot of trust. My mechanic says the engine light came from a problem with the cam, that the crank had jumped three teeth and that it looked like there could be engine damage, all effects which would have been consistent with an inappropriately-performed gasket replacement. At this point, the car is out of the 30-day, 1000 mile dealer service period (even with the car being in the shop for a week with the gasket issue; also I have

1050 miles on total). But I call the dealer, they tow it and instead feel that the problem was caused by a tensioning wheel. No evidence of engine damage, they say. They offer to split the repair cost, which I think is fair, and offer to drive it a bit.

Three days later, the repair is done. Then I get a call with, "Oh by the way, the clutch is slipping and you're going to need to replace that."

Now, I don't expect a higher mileage used car to run like a new one. I anticipate having repairs to a used car. Brakes will go, clutches, pumps and all that. But I find it amazing that I have now had two significant engine repairs, and the clutch is on the way out, within six weeks of purchase. The dealer clearly stated that the car had been looked over carefully before I purchased it, and, of course, touted the service department. Am I unreasonable to think that some of these issues should have been obvious if they did indeed look over the car carefully? Should any of this, or could any of these potential issues have been disclosed prior to purchase?

I am one unhappy Subaru owner who now walks to work every day. Thanks in advance for your replies.... cars are not my specialty.

Reply to
JCF
Loading thread data ...

Reply to
Edward Hayes

Umm, yeah, being upset with the dealer was kinda the point of the original post.

Reply to
JCF

I have learned the same lesson with my first Subaru: Never EVER buy a used Subaru. Usually someone milked one for good and dumped it onto someone else to pay for expensive repairs.

Reply to
Body Roll

Hi,

Sorry your experience hasn't been good, but one must remember used cars are a "buyer beware" item. Some states' laws may require disclosure of "known" problems, but that's not universal practice.

Probably the most important question I ask when looking at a used car is "Why did the previous owner want to replace it?"

With luck, these problems will soon be resolved and you'll become a happier Subie owner.

Rick

Reply to
Rick Courtright

Thanks for the response. I certainly hope it gets better, because the car itself, when it works, is awesome. Stable, responsive, a pleasure to drive.

In my case, the car I bought was billed by the dealer as "a trade that the previous Owner made to buy a new Outback. We usually don't sell high mileage cars, but this one was exceptionally clean....all the maintenance has been done." Buyer beware, I know. On one hand, I am thankful I bought from a dealer because, in an effort to keep their reputation intact, they performed some extensive repairs that they had not counted on; if I had bought privately, I would be SOL. On the other hand, I question whether they bought a piece of junk, couldn't figure that out or knew it and then tried to pass it off onto the next buyer.

I'll have to look into the disclosure laws, and at the very least, will be writing a terse letter to the dealer.

Reply to
JCF

Sorry to hear about your troubles. It should be said that any used car in general, let it be BMW, Honda, Toyota, Subaru, Ferrari, you need to be weary of it's condition, past maintenance history, etc.

Rick Courtright wrote:

Reply to
STiG

Reply to
Edward Hayes

Other than the HG, which Soobs of that model range are known to occasinally have problems with, I don't think your experience is unique either to the car or the dealership. I could argue that it would've been nice to know if the TB was seviced on schedule and if the clutch was original - but really, you could substitute the word toyota, or mazda or Ford for subaru in your story and I bet it has happened a dozen times to someone else. I think also, because folks tend to keep their Soobs around longer, even dealerships are so hungry to be able to offer used models they tend to keep cars that, if a similar condition used Ford showed up, they would send it to the wholesaler. I must say though, it seems your dealership was fair. Ask questions here, look around at

formatting link
and
formatting link
and learn about your car. It will likely be very enjoyable now and hopefully, when you need a new O2 sensor or MAF or rear wheel bearings, you won't be surprised and might be able to fix some of them yourself.

Carl

Reply to
Carl 1 Lucky Texan

There is no difference between Subies and any other make. LOTS of consumers simply dispose of their vehicles after 2 to 3 years. Doesn't matter what is the mileage, low or high. Doesn't matter what is the condition, good or bad. They've been taught or somehow contrued that after a few years that they should get a brand new car because the old one will start having problems soon, whether or not it shows any problems at all when they decide to get rid of it. It's their form of preventative maintenance provided they can afford to lose all that depreciation in the car's value over the front-end heavily weighted reduction period. Also, many can afford their whim of getting a new car because they are simply bored with the old one, like folks that buy different clothes on each shopping spree. That's great for the rest of us that like those dupes to eat up the most depreciation of the vehicle and do all the initial repairs and tweaks for new cars.

Regardless of what the dealer says, even if they claim to have ASE certified mechanics, I still take the prospective purchase to my own auto shop which also employs ASE mechanics (and ALL of them at the auto shop are also master mechanics). If I genuinely am interested in a particular car, I take it in to pay the $100, or so, to have it fully inspected. That doesn't guarantee that all hidden problems become revealed just because the dealer's and auto shop's mechanics all inspected it but it gives an assurance level for the condition of the vehicle.

Reply to
Vanguard

Reply to
bigjim

On 2006-09-12, penned:

Because people buying new cars are not necessarily making a logical decision. Because people buying new cars may have more money than you, and therefore aren't as concerned with that dollar difference. Because people buying new cars are often buying them for the perceived features (bigger engine, better AWD, etc), not because there's anything objectively "wrong" with their old car. Because people have different priorities, and some people may put "shiny new car" at a higher priority than you do.

In short, because there's a lot more to a purchase than pure logic, as car dealers and any other salespeople have known since roughly the dawn of time.

Reply to
Monique Y. Mudama

Many suckers will pay like new prices for a used car. I have kept my last two new cars for eight years and enjoyed years of payment free driving. However when a huge repair hit is on the horizon I dump the car and buy a new one. I would like to keep my 04 OBW for 200k miles but if I see a yellow 4 door Wrangler the subie may have to go sooner.

M> On 2006-09-12, penned:

Reply to
bigjim

I bought outback zerosport 2005 solely because of the terrible reliability with 92 legacy. I loved 92 legacy and hated it's reliability. I hate 05 obs but like it's reliability (heck, I still have 20k+ miles of warranty left, so it'd better behave). I won't buy a used Evo (or any other half decent car for that matter) used though either. If I need to save money on a used car I'd buy some used docile piece of shit that deprecated to the point where it's a "good value". Like Taurus or 500 and have it inspected to make sure the owner was about to die of boredom rather than of a heart attach after seeing a quote for a repair bill. Why buy an old used complex car like Outback? It will fall apart in expensive ways.

Right. A lot more. In my case stupidity was a big part of it.

Reply to
sndive

I disagree. I have traded in used cars while buying a new car three times. Two out of the three times, the car was in perfect working order. I traded because my needs had changed and the car I was trading still retained some value which could be applied to a new car.

In this case, I started my own business last year. I am an architectural consultant, and occasionally need to carry ladders and other testing equipment which do not go in and out of a sedan easily. Furthermore, while business has been successful beyond my expectations, I did not feel that it would be financially responsible to spend $20-25,000 on a new vehicle in the business' name. I also have a newborn son, and so a pickup truck in which he couldn't fit is not an option.

If you're like me, you do some research on the make, model and year of any car before buying. In my case, that included talking to my mechanic, doing a carfax search for the VIN and looking at the consumer reports data (which gave generally very good reports on most major systems for this model and year). Seriously, are you going to go into google groups and type the make, model, year and every single issue that could eventually arise, from brakes to engine to gasket, to other things. Before last week I had never even heard of the term "tensioning wheel."

On the eurojunk comment, I have two VWs, a 99 Jetta and an 02 Passat with a combined 190,000 miles on them. 11 years+ of ownership and not a single significant problem. Normal wear and tear, brakes, tires and such, that's it. Perhaps my experience is not typical.

Reply to
JCF

Just to follow up on my original post, in case anyone is interested.

Late yesterday I spoke to my sales rep, who referred my call to the dealership's general manager this morning. The dealership is concerned about my dissatisfaction and has asked for an opportunity to look over the car once more, have their service manager drive it, etc., and then work either towards another repair or to "get me into a comparable vehicle." There is a long way to go between here and there, but at this point, it is the best I can hope for.

Again, it has been a bad experience, but I am so thankful that at least I am working with a dealer, and that the dealer has been cooperative in attempting to address my concerns.

Reply to
JCF

Yeah, I bought a car for my daughter that was treaded in because a school teacher was being given a new car for xmas by her husband. Not all cars traded in have issues. And many that do, are easily repaired. Some folks just get int eh mindset "Ugh, the CEL light came on TWICE this year! We better dump this car!" And maybe it just needs a front O2 sensor and a new evap system vacuum line or something.

Carl

Reply to
Carl 1 Lucky Texan

I don't know what you expected buying a car with that many miles on it.

Reply to
Paul Knudsen

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.