Someone please tell me.
In late July, I bought a used 99 Outback Wagon, manual transmission, higher mileage, 120K. I didn't pay a lot for it, but having bought it from a dealer who stated that the vehicle had been thoroughly checked, I assumed that I had made a decent, at least moderately reliable, purchase.
Two days after purchase, I noticed the temp gauge climbing. No engine light, but after driving it a bit, I opened the hood, and the coolant was boiling. Dealer towed it, said the head gasket was blown and there was piston damage. They towed and repaired at no charge. Good.
Four weeks later, the engine starts sputtering and the check engine light comes on. Since the dealer is 40 miles away, I take it to my local mechanic, who has serviced other cars for me over a 10 year period and in whom I have a lot of trust. My mechanic says the engine light came from a problem with the cam, that the crank had jumped three teeth and that it looked like there could be engine damage, all effects which would have been consistent with an inappropriately-performed gasket replacement. At this point, the car is out of the 30-day, 1000 mile dealer service period (even with the car being in the shop for a week with the gasket issue; also I have
1050 miles on total). But I call the dealer, they tow it and instead feel that the problem was caused by a tensioning wheel. No evidence of engine damage, they say. They offer to split the repair cost, which I think is fair, and offer to drive it a bit.Three days later, the repair is done. Then I get a call with, "Oh by the way, the clutch is slipping and you're going to need to replace that."
Now, I don't expect a higher mileage used car to run like a new one. I anticipate having repairs to a used car. Brakes will go, clutches, pumps and all that. But I find it amazing that I have now had two significant engine repairs, and the clutch is on the way out, within six weeks of purchase. The dealer clearly stated that the car had been looked over carefully before I purchased it, and, of course, touted the service department. Am I unreasonable to think that some of these issues should have been obvious if they did indeed look over the car carefully? Should any of this, or could any of these potential issues have been disclosed prior to purchase?
I am one unhappy Subaru owner who now walks to work every day. Thanks in advance for your replies.... cars are not my specialty.