My manual says to change the timing belt at 60,000 on my 2003TL...I'm at a little over 60,000 and my car still runs and looks brand new...Has anyone else waited to change theirs or should I do it now?
- posted
16 years ago
Timing belt
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
"apdicenzo" wrote in news:vVBDi.238358$ snipped-for-privacy@newsfe14.lga:
Where do you live?
Your regularly scheduled replacement is at 105K miles or 84 months. The 60K is for extreme temperature conditions.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Hmmm, our 2003 Accord V-6 with a similar engine calls for timing belt change at 105k miles. Are you looking at the extreme services interval instead of normal service?
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Whatever you do, don't skip the timing belt replacement. If left too long, they will fail, causing potentially major engine damage. Speaking from experience!
--
--------------------------------- --- -- - Posted with NewsLeecher v3.9 Beta 8 Web @
formatting link
----- ---- -- -