----- Original Message ----- From: "maxpower" Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.chrysler Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:30 PM Subject: Re: 2000 T&C brake line broke.
The private shop personnel were outrageously surprised, saying they had never seen THAT fail before. Anyway, the gist of the action was that evidently the shop couldn't reset the brake computer and clear the codes, or perhaps that Chrysler has some 'special/electronic' technique of flushing the brake lines (massive bleeding action to remover all air and replace all brake hydraulic fluid), which they either couldn't do, or can't accomplish since they don't have the proper tool.
Does that make sense that Chrysler/dodge/plymouth 'gimmick' their automotive engineering in such a way that second party repair shops can't repair a vehicle and it MUST be taken to an authorized dealer to get the work done?
My head is still spinning..
______________________________________
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ==================================
I have seen that hose rust and break a few times and I believe it was due to undercoating/soundproofing that was sprayed on the vehicle after it left the factory. The soundproofing/undercoating trapped the water in the flexible casing and rusted it out causing the damage. The first experience I had was bleeding the brakes after I did a break job on the lift and it broke when the pressure was applied. There re two of those hoses together, I hope the other hose was inspected also Your car is equipped with Antilock brakes and yes it does take a special scan tool to bled the hydraulic brake assembly or the air will never get out of the system. If that shop has never seen that before they must not work on to many of these cars because that system has been there for at least 3 years Its not a gimmick, its a procedure
Glenn Beasley Chrysler Tech
______________________________________
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ==================================
Thanks for the info. I will check and make sure BOTH the damaged flexible hose AND the other one is changed out. Won't cost the extra hose plus a bit more time to do that. I somehow get the uneasy feeling that the brake line bleeding is going to be a LOT higher than I am going to be happy about. Maybe I will be surprised. Who knows!!!! I don't think our van was undercoated. It seems that many consumer groups don't recommend the undercoating as it allows road salt, dirt and just plain water to get between the body/frame and the undercoating and possibly cause much more damage than the undercoating can prevent.
Now here's another dumb question. IF some or a lot of brake fluid got on the driver caliper -- hence brake pad, would that necessitate replacing all four brake pads on the car? The reason I ask is that I just had front brakes replaced/redone about six months ago -- late last spring. There are only about 4,000 miles or so on the brakes since being replaced.
The private shop I took the car too probably doesn't 'specialize' in brakes, and they can probably do 90% (wild guess?) of all brake work. Evidently Chrylser/dodge/plymouth is part of that 10% which requires special tools to thwart private garage type work.