300m Timing Belt questions

A) it IS something you can borrow at a parts store, and B) you don't actually have to pull the balancer to get the covers and belt off on a 3.5 if the balancer is the spoked type (mine was) instead of a solid disk. I've never seen a solid disk balancer on a 3.5, but I've heard (read) that they did in fact use it on some models. That would require the puller.

Reply to
Steve
Loading thread data ...

If I still had our old 3.5, I'd show you ;-) I did it both times I changed the T-belt on that car during the ~260k miles we owned it. But as I said, the "harmonic balancer" on that car was a spoked pulley with big openings that allowed getting a wrench on the timing belt cover bolts to remove them.

Reply to
Steve

So is ours -- maybe I'll try it next time!

Actually, the harmonic balancer needed to be replaced anyway...

Reply to
Joe Pfeiffer

I just looked at the Chrysler parts pdf's for all '98 thru '04 LH cars - all show the identical part number (4663176 - no suffixes) for the 3.5L damper pulley. I'm willing to bet that means all have the same (spoked) damper. But I could be wrong.

Reply to
Bill Putney

Even with the spokes, you have to clench your tongue between your teeth JUUUUST right to get that lower cover off and work the belt out from behind the pulley, then the new one in and the lower cover back on. But it was much easier in the long run than pulling the damper. Unless you have to replace those O-rings behind the timing case- then its all gotta come off. Cam pulleys too. But that's one thing our old 3.5 never needed in 260k miles. I understand it was the exception, not the rule.

Reply to
Steve

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.