Re: Challenge every Red Light Camera Ticket!

Good thing most states wont allow these as you have to be handed a citation in hand in person at the time of the infraction by the officer who witnessed the infraction.

Once in a blue moon, you read in the paper about the occasional challenge to a citation that a cop mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle. In my state, every single one of those gets tossed as they are "constitutionally invalid". The problem is, most people just pay up and don't fight.

Reply to
Mark
Loading thread data ...

Would you pull over for one? I know I wouldn't. Too many loonies out there pretending to be cops.

The state police in my state uses lots of different unmarked vehicles (Taurus, Crown Vic, even a few Chrysler products) and they will call for a marked vehicle to make the stop.

I think I'd just get on my cell phone to verify that the guy behind me was real before I pulled over.

Reply to
Mark

You must not live in an area with high traffic volumes. Simply "redesigning" intersections isn't going to stop red light runners.

Reply to
Threeducks

Many years ago I recall hearing that the German approach was to have large numbers of clearly marked police cars -- to deter rather than simply apprehend lawbreakers.

MB

On 09/22/04 08:06 pm 127.0.0.1 put fingers to keyboard and launched the following message into cyberspace:

Reply to
Minnie Bannister

About 10 years ago when I lived in socal I lived in Hacienda heights and worked in Whittier. Using city streets instead of the freeway there was a short (maybe 2 mile) section of 4 lane road with almost no side streets. traffic would run at 60 or better. The local cops put a patrol car on the shoulder. Sometimes it was manned, but sometimes it had a dummy in it. Needless to say, traffic slowed down to the speed limit (40 or 45) because drivers were never sure if it was a real cop or a dummy.

Reply to
max-income

Maybe this is why I haven't seen a lot of these cameras in Texas: the traffic code there states that if a driver enters an intersection legally, he/she can leave the intersection legally.

Therefore, it doesn't matter if the light turns red while you're in the intersection-- you don't get a ticket so long as the light was yellow when you entered it.

There is no ability to shorten yellows to trap drivers so the profit motive just ain't there.

Reply to
BTR1701

How do you know?

Other than just you saying so, I mean.

Reply to
BTR1701

Depends on the redesign.

If you redesign it so that one road passes under or over the other and you eliminate the need for the signal entirely... well, I'd bet that would lower the number of red-light runners to zero.

Reply to
BTR1701

Sure there is, even so. To give you an extreme example, let's say that there's a 50 MPH speed limit on a road you typically drive. The yellow light at a camera-controlled intersection lasts only 0.5 second. You may see the light turn yellow while you're a few hundred feet away and (logically) assume that it's going to last 4-5 seconds based on the speed of traffic, so you keep your foot in it, as you could probably barely stop before the intersection without locking 'em up as it is, and you will likely have cleared the intersection within 5 seconds if you maintain speed. However, the light turns red before you enter the intersection, and smile! you know the rest.

An extreme example, but the same sort of thing happens all the time with RLC's, just not quite as short yellows.

nate

Reply to
Nate Nagel

That would totally eliminate all left turn accidents as well. Round-abouts minimize the severity of the inevitable accidents. They're even starting to now bring them to this continent.

Reply to
Full_Name

You haven't thought it thru very well. The yellow is there to warn the drivers that it will turn red in a few seconds. If it turns red too qickly, then entering the intersection "legally" (i.e., on the yellow) doesn't apply (because there's this thing called "finite stopping distance").

Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x')

Reply to
Bill Putney

We've started to get them in Metro Detroit.

I don't understand why they're supposed to be all that great. For one thing, it virtually assures that everyone reaching the intersection

*has* to stop. Not so with a traditional intersection, where people who are traveling at the correct speed can sail through green light after green light.

The intersection near my home where they've implemented this is a relatively low-traffic-volume spot. I imagine it would be absolutely miserable in higher-traffic-volume places.

Bridges with ramps just intuitively seem better to me.

--Geoff

Reply to
Geoff

Ever been to Boston? They had a few there when I was a kid (60s). We called them rotarys. They have a modified version here in Portland, OR.

Reply to
max-income

If you've got clear vision & they're designed correctly you shouldn't have to shed more than 10% of your speed (seeing as it's a 4 way yield). I've been through Europe where the roundabout is a slightly raised (4" round mound in the middle of an intersection. on off hours I've seen many people drive through at full speed.

The problem with round-abouts (true round-abouts & not these 1/4 round affairs) is that poor drivers don't try to "merge", they stop & wait for a large gap.

"If" roadway etiquette is followed a large number of people can pass through with minimal interruption and greater safety.

(bad drivers can totally screw up round-abouts though. When I was in the UK this past winter 3 drivers were banned from a private tunnel's round-about b/c monitoring determined that those 3 were responsible for nearly 60% of the morning's delay's! this was a tunnel used by thousands).

And yes, Bridges with ramps are "better" unless you're the taxpayer who's got to pay for them or look at them. But with many North American Drivers or newer European drivers (those who've gotten their licenses in the past 5 years) round-abouts are terrors.

Reply to
Full_Name

One of the news magazine took a look at several of the lights people were complaining about. The yellows were not abnormally short for the speed of the intersection compared with intersections without cameras.

Reply to
Art

You specifically remember it wrong. There were a bunch of complaints about short yellow suspicions but when investigated they were actually longer yellows in some cases than equivalent intersections with no cameras. You probably heard the promo for the report, but not the actual report which found there was nothing to the short yellow complaints except for drivers going thru red lights on purpose.

They just installed red light cameras in Cary, NC. The cameras also detect speed though tickets aren't given for speed violations. It is incredible how badly people drive. 65 mph when they should be going 45 on a busy road. Right thru red lights. The cameras have a caught a bunch of accidents on film too. Should make litigation easy.

In London there are cameras all over the place. Has reduced crime in London though people complain the crime has just moved to cities without cameras.

Reply to
Art

And is that practical?

Reply to
Threeducks

See, that's exactly the problem. Around here, we have a lot of 'Yield' signs placed where stop signs should be. People who don't ignore the yield signs routinely (same ones who roll through stop signs) are conditioned to stop for them. I am, I must confess. The yield sign doesn't evoke the 'proper' behavior as assumed by the roundabout design.

I submit that waiting for people to start exhibiting the proper behavior will be pretty hopeless.

Around here, proper roadway etiquette means that you resist the urge to give somebody the finger while you cut them off! :-)

All kidding aside, if you don't drive pretty defensively (and somewhat aggressively) you're in for more than your fair share of wreckage around here. I've not owned a single vehicle that hasn't been struck in the rear at least once by somebody else, and believe me, it isn't because I'm not going fast enough!

The roundabout thing is a nice idea, but I sure wouldn't want one at a major intersection, and I'm not convinced that they're a good idea anywhere else, given the conditions on the local roadways. In good weather, they can be difficult at best. When things are covered with ice for the four months or so that can happen here, the roundabout is going to be synonymous with 'traffic jam'.

--Geoff

Reply to
Geoff

symptons of a larger problem.

---------- Alex

Reply to
Alex Rodriguez

Plenty of volume in NYC. Redesigning won't stop all red light runners, but it will prevent most of them.

-------------- Alex

Reply to
Alex Rodriguez

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.