Is it just me?

What were ya racing a 1982 2.5 liter carbed stock Firebird? :) Joe--ASE Certified Parts Specialist & 10th Ann.Club Tech Director '80 Carousel Red Turbo T/A, 26k orig. '79 "Y89" 400/4 speed 10th Ann. T/A, 57k orig '84 Olds 88 Royale Bgm 2 dr, 307 "Rocket" (lol), 141k and still going.... '80 T/A project car...

Reply to
Bigjfig
Loading thread data ...

I know Ford products as much as I know GM products.

What I do know is that GM is the world's #1 car maker, and Ford is not. :) Joe--ASE Certified Parts Specialist & 10th Ann.Club Tech Director '80 Carousel Red Turbo T/A, 26k orig. '79 "Y89" 400/4 speed 10th Ann. T/A, 57k orig '84 Olds 88 Royale Bgm 2 dr, 307 "Rocket" (lol), 141k and still going.... '80 T/A project car...

Reply to
Bigjfig

Sure, many times before. I just worked on one of your beloved POS FOMOCO products belonging to my relative, a Ford Taurus.

What a god awful creation of a vehicle. LOL. Joe--ASE Certified Parts Specialist & 10th Ann.Club Tech Director '80 Carousel Red Turbo T/A, 26k orig. '79 "Y89" 400/4 speed 10th Ann. T/A, 57k orig '84 Olds 88 Royale Bgm 2 dr, 307 "Rocket" (lol), 141k and still going.... '80 T/A project car...

Reply to
Bigjfig

Depending which side of the fence you're on in this one?

Almost like armchair politics, Repugnant, Defocrats!

Some eat at McDonalds others at burger King, I prefer a local diner for a burger.

Refinish King

Reply to
Refinish King

For a Cobra to keep up:

Most likely so!

Refinish King

PS At least Don, and you Joe are good natured in your ribbing. Some of the others are downright psychotic!

Reply to
Refinish King

Yeah...but I was only hitting on 5 cylinders.

Don Manning

Reply to
2.3Sleeper

Is that when your boyfriend pops up off your lap??

Reply to
CBHVAC

Does your father know you talk about him like that?

Don Manning

Reply to
2.3Sleeper

Good gawd, are *all* you chevy guys gay?

CobraJet

Reply to
CobraJet

Nah...2.3 is alright...just messing with him a bit..

Besides, unless GM suddenly surprises me in the next few days, I have a black on black Mach1 waiting for me to make up my mind. Thinking seriously about trading in the 92 Stang on it.

Come on CJ..you know I am not bothered in the least about gay jokes, comments or the like. I like gay people...they pay in cash, and dont argue about the bill...LOL

Reply to
CBHVAC

CBHVAC spilled my beer when they jumped on the table and proclaimed in

Ooh!

What's it got under the hood?

NOI

Reply to
Thund3rstruck_n0i

An engine..LOL!!!

4.6L 32 Valve....305HP...not a Cobra, but you gotta love the real shaker hood...

formatting link

Reply to
CBHVAC

CBHVAC spilled my beer when they jumped on the table and proclaimed in

Ah. One of the new, cookie-cut Mach 1's. :)

NOI

Reply to
Thund3rstruck_n0i

I was contemplating one a little while ago myself. However, as a traditionalist, I couldn't handle the shaker combined with the sharp drop-off of the hood line. In general, I have this problem with both Mustangs and Camaros. The fact that I cannot see sheet metal past the windshield when driving really bothers me. I need a sense of physical perimeter, for lack of a better phrase. Also, both interiors are too confining in the driver's area. In years past I've been most comfortable in Torinos and Cyclones, which is probably why I have a Crown Vic daily driver now. Flat hood, roomy interior. Not fast, but adequate.

CobraJet

Reply to
CobraJet

message

Reminds me of a few friends in the Navy that bought cars based on the length of the hood. If you couldn't land a fighter jet on it, it wasn't adequate.

Don Manning

I need a sense of physical

Reply to
2.3Sleeper

That explains why he was talking about a 1 yo mustwank and a 5 yo Firebird...

F
Reply to
F

You're so right you can't. But then, when the 2002 F-bodies still stomp on the latest Mustings you don't really need to either. When a

2004 can't outdo a 2002 then you say it is beh>Ford is behind GM? Go get your 2004 Firebird/Camaro and line it up against
Reply to
SgtSilicon

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.