Re: "Integrated" radios in some cars prohibit upgrades

This is too funny for words. It's a car for cripe sakes! Why, all of a sudden, do cars need a "user interface"? So, I take it cars will be as easy to use as VCR's are...huh?! We all know from surveys that less than 5% of the population even know how to use their VCR. I guess that explains why my neighbor (after 3 years) still can't figure out how to make his lights (not the DRLs, but the regular lights) turn off on his LeSabre in the daytime. Look folks this is real simple. A multi-detent pull switch for the lights and one for the wipers (none of this "stalk" crap!). A couple of knobs for the climate controls and the radio. Bingo...you can drive anywhere now. Simple...huh?! Geesh..."user interface"...gimme a break!!!

Thankfully You've got Chrysler's vaunted build quality to assure you that you won't have to do many repairs for the first 5,000 miles :-)

I Love the look & the driving feel of the LH's BUT when it came to spending my money on something that I'd actually have to own and maintain I bought an Olds 98. For the wife it was a Windstar to replace the Caravan.

On the whole I'd say that Chryslers are great cars.... to lease ! On the subject of messy dashboards. A standard DIN chassis makes sure that any radio change looks clean. I wish that on my car I could change the radio for something includes XM reception but the radio size and the controls in the steering wheel preclude a clean swap :(

Simple...huh?!

I agree. Except that he was right, cars need a user interface to display all computer input and output data, the logic behind it, and error codes. Unfortunately, they don't have it. Using the radio to control other, simplistic functions is just silly. It's the worst of both worlds. They don't want you to replace your radio, AND they don't want you to be able to fix an intermittent engine problem.

Fuel injected cadillacs actually had that engine computer interface built into them for years (not in the radio, it was in the hvac controls). I don't know if they still do or not, or if any other cars have it. But it was awesome and it's really needed.

Yup, I'm in the same position on my 97 Taurus.. Gave you seen the oval dash inserts so you can put a standard radio in? ugh.. They look terrible.. really bad.

Look at all of the systems that are available in a modern car

The best way to handle all of this is one large LCD in place of the instrument cluster. I think the Pacifica already does this (I'm judging from the ads I haven't seen the inside of a Pacifica), but every other car still spreads these functions over a number of separate devices. When the nav system is standard then we will see a single integrated system, until then we will be stuck with a proliferation of separate systems.

GM isn't the only, or even the biggest offender. Very few auto makers offer cassette players in their cars anymore. I too would prefer a cassette deck, but lotsa luck!

I'm not a big one for a lot of bells & whistles on a car myself. I just want basic transportation...reliable and roomy. Quality construction too...not some tinny pos like a Kia or a Hundai. I don't have the slightest use for climate control, remote keyless entry or any of the other doodads that seem to be standard equipment these days.

Makes one wonder how we ever survived all those years without all that stuff. ;-)

| > I HOWEVER DO NOT WANT IT ALL COMBINED. | >

| >

| > There are customers that are forced to take a CD stereo in there new | > caddilac, yet the customer goes out searching for an add on CASSETTE player. | > And there ARE NONE MADE! | | GM isn't the only, or even the biggest offender. Very few auto makers | offer cassette players in their cars anymore. I too would prefer a | cassette deck, but lotsa luck! | | I'm not a big one for a lot of bells & whistles on a car myself. I | just want basic transportation...reliable and roomy. Quality | construction too...not some tinny pos like a Kia or a Hundai. I don't | have the slightest use for climate control, remote keyless entry or | any of the other doodads that seem to be standard equipment these | days.

I agree. How did we get to this place?

We survived without TV, personal computers and antibiotics, that doesn't mean that anyone wants to go back to a world without those things.

| > Makes one wonder how we ever survived all those years without all that stuff. | > ;-) | | We survived without TV, personal computers and antibiotics, that doesn't | mean that anyone wants to go back to a world without those things. |

Apples and oranges. Simple system/component controls existed on cars before a "user interface". Those on your list didn't exist. IF progress adds value, sure. Adding color, surround sound, etc to TV for example. But having 25 layers of menus to program lighting and wiper functions is just a bit much...don't ya think? When one needs to refer to a manual to control things that were intuitive before...that is, by definition, a "value-negative" proposition.

In '86 the Buick Riviera came out with their touchscreen graphical interface which controlled the radio/climate control/trip computer/diagnostic info., etc.. That was a pretty cool set-up. It probably sold a ton of Rivieras.

Seems like it'd be easy to have a video monitor in the middle of the dash to control the climate control/radio/navigation/trip computer/diagnostic/DVD player, etc.. As far as the navigation system having to be standard to have this system as a standard, the nav system could simply be another program built into the in car PC/video system. If they don't order the nav system, then it simply won't contain it.

Given a few years, might not be an issue. After all how many small hardware stores are left in your hometown?

VW, Audi, GM & I think BMW are building cars in China. My Dad never wanted a VW built in Mexico, yet................

Unfortunately, it's only a matter of time..

You may be right about this........... Glad I like Chinese food. :-)

New car buyers have driven these features, and today, new car buyers seem to be the most ill-informed about cars group of people there are.

Ted

I'll trade my cassette deck for your cd player :-). I'll even throw in a replacement light bulb for the display's backlight (it's currently dead). Just come on over.

Include power windows and locks - those are very handy. Otherwise KISS! (Keep It Simple, Stupid)

Yeah, I like my old standard shift pickup :-).

-D

New car buyers don't have to worry about long term reliability or longevity of the product. They have a warranty. They tend to buy new cars when the warranty is finished.

Second owners are the ones to have to deal with the garbage gadgets stuck into the cars. New car manufacturers don't give a damn about second owners because they don't buy new cars. Manufacturers only have to appease the warranty crowd.

Second owners who get fed up of failing power windows, horribly expensive alternator replacements, inaccessable wiper motors etc etc eventually end up being new car buyers to get that warranty. However, in the process, second owners tend to move to better made foreign cars.

While certainly the new car buyer is the *primary* concern of the manufacturer, if the used car buyer quits buying the first owner's cast offs, the used car value drops, which will have some effect on purchasing decisions of new car buyers (i.e., anticipated low resale value can cause them to buy a competitor's product instead).

If that's true, then, again, the used market for the one-owner used so-called domestic cars dries up, negatively impacting prices/ saleability of both used and new. This being a Chrysler newsgroup, some here probably understand the impact on the market of a reputation for low resale value. 8^)

Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x')

Chinese food in America is just as american as apple pie... I had a roommate from Hong Kong back in college who loved pointing this out as he ate his freeze dried seaweed.

-Bret

| > Second owners are the ones to have to deal with the garbage gadgets stuck | > into the cars. New car manufacturers don't give a damn about second owners | > because they don't buy new cars. Manufacturers only have to appease the | > warranty crowd. | | While certainly the new car buyer is the *primary* concern of the | manufacturer, if the used car buyer quits buying the first owner's cast | offs, the used car value drops, which will have some effect on | purchasing decisions of new car buyers (i.e., anticipated low resale | value can cause them to buy a competitor's product instead). | | > Second owners who get fed up of failing power windows, horribly expensive | > alternator replacements, inaccessable wiper motors etc etc eventually end up | > being new car buyers to get that warranty. However, in the process, second | > owners tend to move to better made foreign cars. | | If that's true, then, again, the used market for the one-owner used | so-called domestic cars dries up, negatively impacting prices/ | saleability of both used and new. This being a Chrysler newsgroup, some | here probably understand the impact on the market of a reputation for | low resale value. 8^) |

Since this thread is cross-posted to Ford and GM Newsgroups, they probably understand low resale value as well. ;-)

I must buck the trend...I keep most vehicles well beyond the warranty...10-15 years and well into 100K miles...yet I always buy brand new when the time comes. One recent exception was a 2003 Chevy Malibu LS I dumped on CarMax about a year ago after putting up with it for 9 months. The car had way...WAY..WWWAAAAYYYY too many "auto" features on it for my taste. Drove me nuts ever time I got in the POS! I buy low end $16K or less models because I'm basically a cheap B**tard ant those models are basic...like I like them (or so I thought). Who would have thought a low-end model like the Malibu would have so many annoying things about it. Thankfully the "auto" speed-sensitive radio volume control could be disabled!! If only all of the other "auto" stuff could have been too. That might have made the car tolerable to own ;-) (although it had several other significant "quality" issues too and spent some time at the dealer for those). Anyway, replaced it with a 2004 Sebring...going on 14 months and not a single quality problem and everything (but the tranny) is manual...I'm in heaven!! :-) Yes I already know that the 2.7 Chrysler engine it has will probably not last 100K+ miles. But the Malibu 3.1 had it's piston slap and intake manifold gasket failure problems too...so...