> >>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> >>>>> "Yer Pal Al" wrote in
>>>>>
messagenews: snipped-for-privacy@k6g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ChasNemo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Moonbats say America doesn't make vehicles people want.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, so much for that fairy tale.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
formatting link
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like 9 of the 15 are made by non US manufacturers. ?Why >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should start a thread asking that question.
>>>>>>>>>>>> You should try dealing with this thread, Shitty.
>>>>>>>>>>> xxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> That's exactly what I'm doing.
>>>>>>>>>>> The question is:
>>>>>>>>>>> Re: What's the Top Selling Vehicle In America?
>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to ASK questions rather than ANSWER this posted
>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>> by all means start a new posting.
>>>>>>>>>>> That's how it works :-)
>>>>>>>>>>> 29
>>>>>>>>>> Smits is a stict constructionist. Justice Scalia is his lord and
>>>>>>>>>> master.
>>>>>>>>> You are a heathen Satanist, evil is your byword.
>>>>>>>> No, Scalia is evil. Our Constitution is in danger from the likes of >>>>>>>> him.
>>>>>>> "On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time
>>>>>>> when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested >>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out >>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in >>>>>>> which
>>>>>>> it was passed." -Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, 1823
>>>>>>> I entirely concur in the propriety of resorting to the sense in >>>>>>> which
>>>>>>> the Constitution was accepted and ratified by the nation. In that
>>>>>>> sense alone it is the legitimate Constitution. And if that be not >>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> guide in expounding it, there can be no security for a consistent >>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> stable, more than for a faithful, exercise of its powers. . . . What >>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> metamorphosis would be produced in the code of law if all its >>>>>>> ancient
>>>>>>> phraseology were to be taken in its modern sense. - James Madison to
>>>>>>> Henry Lee, June 25, 1824
>>>>>>> The first and governing maxim in the interpretation of a statute is
>>>>>>> to discover the meaning of those who made it. - James Wilson, Of the
>>>>>>> Study of Law in the United States, 1790
>>>>>>> "The first and fundamental rule in the interpretation of all
>>>>>>> instruments is, to construe them according to the sense of the >>>>>>> terms,
>>>>>>> and the intention of the parties." - Joseph Story, Commentaries on >>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Constitution of the United States, 1833
>>>>>>> "The Constitution means what I want it to mean." - Ruth Bader >>>>>>> Ginsburg
>>>>>> xxxx
>>>>>> Have you driven a FORD lately?
>>>>> I would never buy one and I avoid them when I rent. Not since 1988
>>>>> have a driven one. It was uncomfortable.
>>>>> And '88 was a good year compared to the shit Ford, GM and Chrysler >>>>> tried to
>>>>> pass off as decent cars in the 70s.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>> Fords in the early 70's rusted through roofs and fender tops in less
>>>> than 2 years. ?Ford absolutely stonewalled repairs unless an owner
>>>> threatened Ford severely. ?Legions of Ford owners swore they'd never
>>>> buy one again. ?FORD = Fix or Repair Daily = Found on the Road Dead.-
>>>> Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> So what? ?Big deal. ?What an asshole you are.- Hide quoted text - >>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> That from a Bu$h ass kisser means NADA.
>
> ...and that from an Obama leg humper means the same....