The same Court that ruled corporations were "persons," who can be sued in
both criminal and civil court, has now ruled they MUST therefore have the
freedom of political speech guaranteed in the Constitution to every
IF the people do not agree corporations are people than they must amend the
Constitution. IF that happens Corporations will no longer BE "persons," who
can be sued in both criminal and civil court.
Can you imagine the shark lawyers, that control the Senate, ever allowing
that amendment to ever be introduced let alone be passed by the Congress?
Of course it is, and if you dont like that, campaign to amend the constitution.
Corse you will have to do that in the face of corporate TV advertising opposing
If you dont like that, blame those who wrote that constitutional amendment that
did not have
the forsight to predict that downside of their very swingeing wording they chose
But hard to lynch a corps now tho.
We, the lowly citizens, cant even get our elected officials to look at term
campaign finance reform, etc.
And, no, I dont like the fact that our government is effectively steered by
representing big money groups.
We tread along the tightwire of the law, sometimes, but I feel that the
government by, of, and for the people is being hijacked.
It is all about money and power.
Hey, they did pretty good really, better than most other countries. But
given liberalism and the corrupt time they will always run anything down
to decay unless the people are hard nosed about it.
I say hard nosed, as someone needs to publically tell Obama his
corruption and mamoth debt spend is screwing people. And call him a
True. My main objection is to their objection to standing
armys and its easy to see why they went that way with that.
And they didnt do anything about slavery, and easy to see
why they decided that that wasnt feasible at that time too.
Which isnt a bad effort considering that it was one of the first.
And even when they are, that isnt necessarily enough.
Yes, the provision on free speech is certainly one of the most important rights.
Also not surprising given the history in western europe at that time.
Its the only possibility for getting anything done about either.
And the farts that wrote the constitution were the epitomy of money and power at
that time too.
In a way yes. Say I have the republican AND the democrat would be
president in my pocket. Have squeeze on his corruption and pay them lots.
Going into an eletion, how mny people have voted but not voted for a
democrat or republican? That is vote without the two parties in mind?
He is right, follow the money and power. The rest is bullshit for the
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.