2012 looks to be the year of the real electrical cars.
Some big players are reluctantly entering the market.
If they do not they will be left in the dust.
At a minumum they are coming with a plug in plug-in-hybrid like the Volt but
better, lighter and less costly so it will be interesting to see what GM is
going to do.
Will they come forward with a real car or be left in the dust?
If GM's experience with quasielectric cars is the form of the future,
maybe the big players better be reluctant. This is far far from a
I would say in 300 years they will mostly be electric. But not in this
Electric vehicles need two ingredients to really make it work main
stream. And neither issue has been resolved.
First is better batteries. Sorry, cutting in gas in 40 miles isn't
electric, it is non-value added complexity. And there is a mater of
expense too, Lithium isn't cheap and an environmental hazard in its own
right. Better, safer and less toxic batteries are needed.
Second issue is power. Paying someone else to burn the carbon and line
loss, charging loss isn't efficient use of energy. Carbon still flies,
or plutonium still pollution of a more deadly kind. Even if we could
politically manage nuclear, which Japan proves we cannot, be so many of
them the probabilities of Japan accidents happening every year become real.
More likely to occur, and already occurring in Asia is cars become
obsolete as permanent fixtures in a garage. Replaced by public
transportation, usually subway rail or maglev for distances. If you
need a car for the weekend to go fishing, you rent one. but for day to
day city life, end of cars in favor of a local electric rail trolley.
Imagine traveling to the edge of city to get a car for the hike to the
mountains and a maglev for elsewhere. At 350+ mph maglev rapid transit
planes then become obsolete for short non-water travel.
The reality is if cars can't be made cheap and for the tasks needed,
they will in time become obsolete and less pervasive in our society.
Even the government Motors came up with 100,000 miles per gallon at $50
million per car, no one is going to buy it.
Corrupt USA, Euro Bank and Military Regime, funding both sides of
terrorism for profit and debt-tax slavery.
Den lφrdagen den 31:e december 2011 kl. 05:45:52 UTC skrev Canuck57:
The electrics are finally coming and they are coming in strong this year and next.
You are right that they need these things but wrong that they have not been solved because they have.
GMs of this world may want to stall the development and say things like that to keep people in fear but it is not true anymore.
Ordinary electrical cars with no space issues are going 400 miles without need to recharge.
Strangely enough then lithium is relatively cheap and there is a lot of it.
Nuclear is a solution and so are many other energy sources to create electricity.
This is an interesting development and strange that the US is not doing much but they have been ruled by GM and its short sighted vision for a long time.
Electrical car can and are made cheap but at the moment sold with a lot of profit and therefore too expensive but that will change too.
Electrical car can and are made cheap but at the moment sold with a lot of
profit and therefore too expensive but that will change too.
Not so many are really sold now, in the USA, and even though the bloody Volt
is not so
cheap, I dont think GM makes significant money on it.
Like you, I believe that in the future the issues with electric cars can be
But not yet.
The USA attacked Irak for no good reason some years ago and lost that war as
so many other battles lately and came out with the tail behind the legs
The rest of the world has lost respect for the USA and the USA is becoming
I agree that the USA was ill advised to go into Iraq for the reasons the
government gave. There
were no remaining weapons of mass destruction. It is, however, also true
that Saddam had
plans to start this work again as soon as he could get the world's eyes off
Coming out with "the tail between the legs" might not be a good thing to say
to a veteran of
this conflict. It is indicative of the way Obama has tried to run the
nation, but not true of
the spirit of the global forces which were sent to Iraq. Until we get this
leftist drittsekk out of
office and find an intelligent leader, we will be in trouble.
The USA seems to be building up a new web of lies in order to attack Iran.
In this the USA is alone again and the reason for this new war is again oil.
The USA has no consideration for other people nor nations if the aim is getting their hands on more oil.
The USA has effectively lost the war in Afghanistan, lost the war in Iraq and is now planning to attack Iran.
Interestingly the USA is fighting a war against terrorism and who are the enemy?
I heard that the USA has passed a law that they can arrest pretty much anyone in the USA and keep them in prison as long as they please without trial or assistance from a lawyer if they just say that the person can be expected to be a terrorist and the war has come to the USA.
This of course means that the USA has lost the war on terrorism and the terrorists have won with the assistance of the government of the USA.
Letting people go naked through the gates at the airports was and is a similarly ridiculous act.
On 01/01/2012 8:00 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Just like Germany pre-WW II. Germany too put the military expansion on
the credit card then needed war/conquest to avoid an economic collapse.
Even before that post WW I they had a monetary collapse.
Now, the war is under way with USA as the delinquent debtor/aggressor.
Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Iran, China, NK...take your pick.
USA debt-spends more on military than the other top 25 nations of the
world, as if at war with the world. Yep, USA spends more on
CIA/military than Russia, China, Iran, France, UK, Canada and 20 theres
on killing, interference, western terrorism and interference in other
countries affairs. USA is a bully.
US DC is focused on oil and the use of WW II style armament, but in fact
USA is weak.
If China said USD no longer acceptable in trade, without a single shot
USA is economical dead. The flood of people shedding USDs would devalue
the US currency so muh so fast USA would almost shut down with 80% real
unemployment as no one could afford anything.
USA is economically bankrupt and weak.
We will see USA continue to fail as the corruption and government greed
and currency fraud still continue. It may very well be too late for USA
to ever fix it and/or a Russian like 20 years to get it right.
No mater how liberally you try to ignore rationality and reality,
reality always wins in the end.
The USA seems to be building up a new web of lies in order to attack Iran.
The USA is not the only country which believes that Iran is a dangerous
rogue state, and which fears what Iran might do when it develops a
serviceable nuclear warhead.
And these warheads are not too hard to make once you have the one key
ingredient: enough high grade nuclear material to constitute a critical
You dont refine nuclear fuel to high grade just for power generation. For
that, you need only about 5% pure fissionable material. To make weapons
grade material is massively expensive, and you wouldnt do it for any other
reason than to make weapons. The intent is pretty clear, I think.
They have every right to do whatever they please, particularly
including making nuclear weapons, and they would be smart
to do so. If Americans don't want anyone to have such weapons,
all I can say is, you first. Lead by example and don't be such
ultra-hypocrites. The US wouldn't have attacked North Korea,
Vietnam, Grenada, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya had
they possessed nuclear weapons. The Persians aren't now and
have never been idiots.
So you think that felons and terrorists have a right to any weapon
they can obtain? That is essentially what you are saying.
I know a few Iranian people and they are fine, calm, people.
But Iran is not ruled by the people....it is ruled by the ayatollahs
and they let Ahmedinejad walk the dog occasionally. I think they
ARE dangerous, and would prefer that they not have nuclear
You cant lead a mad dog by good example.
Hardly, Monsieur Simpleton. What I am instead clearly
stating is that a soverign nation has not only a right but
a duty to protect itself and its peoples from the ONLY
proven and continued aggressor on the planet to have
used a nuclear weapon in anger. It's surely no coincidence
that that single point was the only one you attempted
(and quite feebly) to address, and accordingly intentionally
Oh yes, the obligatory (their name here) are good people,
it is their government that's evil. You parrot propaganda well.
I don't care for fundamentalist religious sorts myself, but
the evidence is absolutely conspicuous that the Muslims
are the least of the religious hypocrites. Dr. Ahmadinejad
is/was an academician, i.e., an engineering professor, but
the casual American observer would never have occasion
to be aware of that fact from reading the western press.
The U.S. has ALWAYS been aggressive toward and meddler
in Iranian affairs, most recently when supplying weapons
to and encouraging Saddam Hussein to attack its neighbor.
******Yes, the USA used two nuclear devices "for the defense of their
peoples" And who was the aggressor at Pearl Harbor, genius??
It isnt propaganda. I dont expect the Iranian people to want
a US styled government, but I dont think that the most of them
want the demonic government that they have. And I dont believe
they have any way out, other than to rise up and take the government
into their hands by force.
Why would we even care? He is not responsible for any
current engineering projects that I have heard of, and in fact
seems to be a short sighted hate monger.
No, not always. We did indeed meddle mht the Shah. And
for that sort of interference, I feel ashamed. And after the
US embassy was held hostage, the US shadow warriors DID
supply weapons to Saddam Hussein, in retribution. Shit
happens. Get over it.
Hardly. Japan had been reduced to military impotence,
had no ability to any longer be a threat to anyone, and
were more than ready to make peace (Russia had already
joined the Allies against Japan). The US established
nuclear protection as a defense againt Germany, a
(wrongly) perceived technological colossus. The very
moment the bomb was ready it was used against Japan
in pure and sole vegence.
And who was the aggressor at Pearl Harbor, genius??
At Pearl Harbor, Japan. The prior precipitating action
was an oil embargo against Japan, an act of war in
anyones book. Do you know absolutely NOTHING
No, that would be you. He's an acknowledged academician.
The retribution was Iran's act against the embassy personnel
(who had arrogantly ignored lengthy warnings to leave) for
America's intrusion into their affairs.
Direct that comment to those that meddle and attempt
to both covertly and violently force others to act in
a manner they deem appropriate, i.e. the Americans.
Den tisdagen den 3:e januari 2012 kl. 18:11:07 UTC skrev hls:
"Our leaders promise even more safety, asking only a bit more liberty in exchange. Grant them the power to imprison us without charge, lawyer, or trial? President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act into law on New Years Eve while Americans celebrated, unaware that while they danced and sang so much was being lost. Many Americans will wake today, perhaps still in a stupor, to find that their country has been taken. After the celebrations, Troy was no more; what once was America defined by rights and liberty is no more.
In the name of protection, Troy destroyed itself and America is doing the same. Under the guise of national security, we have created a far more dangerous enemy within our gates. With the loss of civil liberty and the trampling of the Bill of Rights, Americans are in greater danger than ever before. We may now be arrested and detained indefinitely without any semblance of due process, by our own military, in our own land."
With the loss of civil liberty and the trampling of the Bill of
Rights, Americans are in greater danger than ever before. We
may now be arrested and detained indefinitely without any
semblance of due process, by our own military, in our own land."
I totally agree with you. Obama sux. But Bush put this
patriot act into vigor.
We are lost, with positions for two* candidates and no satisfactory
(*- a third party candidate would be welcome, but is very likely to
be viable in the USA today)
We will just have to muddle through the best we can.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.